Megalextoria
Retro computing and gaming, sci-fi books, tv and movies and other geeky stuff.

Home » Archive » net.sf-lovers » Dune should be 4 hours
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Switch to threaded view of this topic Create a new topic Submit Reply
Dune should be 4 hours [message #112812] Mon, 16 September 2013 13:55 Go to next message
don is currently offline  don
Messages: 38
Registered: February 2013
Karma: 0
Member
Message-ID: <2963@allegra.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 18-Dec-84 18:18:26 EST
Article-I.D.: allegra.2963
Posted: Tue Dec 18 18:18:26 1984
Date-Received: Wed, 19-Dec-84 03:00:12 EST
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill
Lines: 23
Xref: watmath net.movies:5280 net.sf-lovers:5408

I would like to know if there is really a 4-hour version of Dune.  Is
that just a rumor?  I have certainly seen stills that were not in the
movie (e.g. Shadout Mapes confronting Jessica with a crysknife).  My
main objection to the movie was that it was edited down to
incoherence.  (Why show Kynes being cast out when you are never told he
is the secret leader of the Fremen?)

If there is a 4 hour version, it is certain to appear in Greenwich
Village and a few other pockets of civilization.  (OK, that should have
gone to net.gloat.  Sorry.)

I guess a lot of people are objecting to Lynch's overall vision of
Dune.  I think that is just conservatism.  Lynch has an amazing
imagination.  So don't miss this movie because someone tells you it is
too weird or because someone thinks there should be comedy relief (what
an appalling suggestion for Dune!).

If you read the interviews with Lynch, you will see that he has a lot
of respect for the story (maybe more than it deserves).  He has thought
about what things would look like after an anti-automation revolution.
And how does the corrupt and Byzantine politics of the time effect the
imagery.  Should we be shocked if Dune looks more like Satyricon than
Starwars?
Re: Dune should be 4 hours [message #112838 is a reply to message #112812] Mon, 16 September 2013 13:55 Go to previous message
reiher is currently offline  reiher
Messages: 65
Registered: May 2013
Karma: 0
Member
Message-ID: <2938@ucla-cs.ARPA>
Date: Sat, 22-Dec-84 02:03:12 EST
Article-I.D.: ucla-cs.2938
Posted: Sat Dec 22 02:03:12 1984
Date-Received: Mon, 24-Dec-84 03:01:28 EST
References: <2963@allegra.UUCP>
Reply-To: reiher@ucla-cs.UUCP (Peter Reiher)
Organization: UCLA Computer Science Department
Lines: 29
Summary: 


There probably is not a four hour version of "Dune", at least not in the same 
sense that there is an original version of say, "Heaven's Gate" or "Once Upon A
Time in America".  Most films shoot more
scenes than they use.  The unused scenes are discarded because they do not work,
or because they do not fit in with the rest of the film, or because the film
is too long and they seemed the most
expendable.  Longer doesn't necessarily mean better.  "Dune" was pretty lugubrious
at two and a half hours; even if they
had the footage, it would probably be intolerable at four hours.  Very likely,
Lynch, on his own initiative, cut out
sceenes to bring the running time down to reasonable length, and because they
were not important to his vision of the film, or perhaps even harmful  (sometimes
scenes get shot because producers insist, even if the director has no intention
of using them, sometimes they just don't
work out).  Since there seemed to be 
little controversy about the cut of "Dune", a longer version probably won't
appear in theaters.  If it's a big enough hit, it may show up on TV with cut
scenes restored, like "The Godfather" and "Superman".

I have no complaints whatsoever about how the film looked.  All of my complaints
are about how the story was told.  Lynch gets loads of brownie points for his
visual concepts, but we must remember that he was the director, not just the
production designer.
-- 

        			Peter Reiher
        			reiher@ucla-cs.arpa
        			{...ihnp4,ucbvax,sdcrdcf}!ucla-cs!reiher
  Switch to threaded view of this topic Create a new topic Submit Reply
Previous Topic: The flying nun...er, baron
Next Topic: Re: another 2010 mistake (and more mista
Goto Forum:
  

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Fri Mar 29 08:37:16 EDT 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01871 seconds