Message-ID: <254@decwrl.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 13-Dec-84 15:04:42 EST
Article-I.D.: decwrl.254
Posted: Thu Dec 13 15:04:42 1984
Date-Received: Sat, 15-Dec-84 02:59:54 EST
Sender: daemon@decwrl.UUCP
Organization: DEC Engineering Network
Lines: 18
Look, gravity on ships, okay, I'll put up with that. But gravity on ships for
people and not for pencils? It seems to me that they took the neat pencil
floating stuff from the shuttle to the moon and just had to do it too and
combined it with the gravity on Discovery. Well, after all, the weight of a
pencil ~= 0 compared to the weight of a human. Bye, bye, Newton. (Of course,
what direct experience did he have with pencils in outer space, anyway.)
I've got something to get off my chest: I liked 2001. Lots. I like Kubrick
films (yes, especially "Barry Lyndon"). I didn't like 2010 because I didn't
find it a particularly mature film, and it had what I consider to be some major
flaws in physics, characterization, continuity, and plot.
Frankly, I've always thought god is on Io, instead.
L S Chabot
UUCP: ...decwrl!dec-rhea!dec-amber!chabot
ARPA: ...chabot%amber.DEC@decwrl.ARPA
shadow: [ISSN 0018-9162 v17 #10 p7, bottom vt100, col3, next to next to last]