Megalextoria
Retro computing and gaming, sci-fi books, tv and movies and other geeky stuff.

Home » Archive » net.micro.pc » Re: Kermit vs. Xmodem
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Switch to threaded view of this topic Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: Kermit vs. Xmodem [message #112714] Mon, 16 September 2013 13:50
nather is currently offline  nather
Messages: 90
Registered: May 2013
Karma: 0
Member
Message-ID: <966@utastro.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 29-Jan-85 16:23:15 EST
Article-I.D.: utastro.966
Posted: Tue Jan 29 16:23:15 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 2-Feb-85 00:59:50 EST
References: <24700097@uiucdcs.UUCP>, <400@rlgvax.UUCP>
Organization: UTexas Astronomy Dept., Austin, Texas
Lines: 17

[]
My experience agrees with Rusty's.  We have Umodem, Xmodem (4.2bsd
version) and Kermit on our Vax, and two different Xmodem programs for
our IBM PCs.  We have so far been unable to get Xmodem to work reliably
to upload files, although it works fine in downloading.  Our vax is
very heavily loaded (load averages over 30 are not uncommon) and poor
Xmodem times out and dies.  We might get in and diddle timeouts, but
we took the easy way out: we run Kermit under identical circumstances
and it works fine.  The h19 emulation in MS-DOS Kermit is superior to
any I've found (I've tried 8 of them) for working with "vi" on the vax,
and the ability to upload or download a whole directory with a single
command is hard to beat.

-- 
Ed Nather
Astronony Dept, U of Texas @ Austin
{allegra,ihnp4}!{noao,ut-sally}!utastro!nather
  Switch to threaded view of this topic Create a new topic Submit Reply
Previous Topic: PC Video Cable
Next Topic: dynamic ramdisk, program interupter, fast find for MS-DOS 2.x
Goto Forum:
  

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Thu Apr 25 09:25:45 EDT 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.54665 seconds