Shortest Books Ever Written [message #708] |
Tue, 14 February 2012 20:21 |
trotsky
Messages: 37 Registered: February 2012
Karma: 0
|
Member |
|
|
From Newsgroup: rec.arts.sf.starwars.misc
"Why the 'Star Wars' Prequels Are Better Than the Original Trilogy"
--headline, Yahoo! News, Feb. 10
--- Synchronet 3.13a-Win32 NewsLink 1.83
|
|
|
Re: Shortest Books Ever Written [message #709 is a reply to message #708] |
Wed, 15 February 2012 00:14 |
YourName
Messages: 366 Registered: January 2012
Karma: 0
|
Senior Member |
|
|
From Newsgroup: rec.arts.sf.starwars.misc
In article , "trotsky"
wrote:
> "Why the 'Star Wars' Prequels Are Better Than the Original Trilogy"
> --headline, Yahoo! News, Feb. 10
Nope, the shortest book is this one ...
The End by Me
Chapter 1
The End
;-)
--- Synchronet 3.13a-Win32 NewsLink 1.83
|
|
|
Re: Shortest Books Ever Written [message #710 is a reply to message #709] |
Wed, 15 February 2012 23:33 |
Duggy
Messages: 316 Registered: January 2012
Karma: 0
|
Senior Member |
|
|
From Newsgroup: rec.arts.sf.starwars.misc
On Feb 15, 3:14 pm, YourN...@YourISP.com (Your Name) wrote:
> In article , "trotsky"
> wrote:
>
> > "Why the 'Star Wars' Prequels Are Better Than the Original Trilogy"
> > --headline, Yahoo! News, Feb. 10
>
> Nope, the shortest book is this one ...
>
> The End by Me
>
> Chapter 1
> The End
>
> ;-)
Mine is shorter.
Fin by moi
Chapter 1
Fin.
===
= DUG.
===
--- Synchronet 3.13a-Win32 NewsLink 1.83
|
|
|
Re: Shortest Books Ever Written [message #712 is a reply to message #710] |
Thu, 16 February 2012 00:13 |
YourName
Messages: 366 Registered: January 2012
Karma: 0
|
Senior Member |
|
|
From Newsgroup: rec.arts.sf.starwars.misc
In article
, Duggy
wrote:
> On Feb 15, 3:14=A0pm, YourN...@YourISP.com (Your Name) wrote:
> > In article , "trotsky"
> >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > "Why the 'Star Wars' Prequels Are Better Than the Original Trilogy"
> > > -- headline, Yahoo! News, Feb. 10
> >
> > Nope, the shortest book is this one ...
> >
> > The End by Me
> >
> > Chapter 1
> > The End
> >
> > ;-)
>
> Mine is shorter.
>
> Fin by moi
>
> Chapter 1
>
> Fin.
Hmmm ... I know my French is VERY rusty, but I don't think "by" and
"Chapter" are right. :-)
It is possible to go shorter in English ...
Me by Me
Chapter 1
Me.
;-)
--- Synchronet 3.13a-Win32 NewsLink 1.83
|
|
|
Re: Shortest Books Ever Written [message #713 is a reply to message #709] |
Thu, 16 February 2012 02:13 |
Halmyre
Messages: 2 Registered: February 2012
Karma: 0
|
Junior Member |
|
|
From Newsgroup: rec.arts.sf.starwars.misc
On Feb 16, 5:13 am, YourN...@YourISP.com (Your Name) wrote:
> In article
> , Duggy
>
>
>
>
>
> wrote:
> > On Feb 15, 3:14=A0pm, YourN...@YourISP.com (Your Name) wrote:
> > > In article , "trotsky"
>
> > > wrote:
>
> > > > "Why the 'Star Wars' Prequels Are Better Than the Original Trilogy"
> > > > -- headline, Yahoo! News, Feb. 10
>
> > > Nope, the shortest book is this one ...
>
> > > The End by Me
>
> > > Chapter 1
> > > The End
>
> > > ;-)
>
> > Mine is shorter.
>
> > Fin by moi
>
> > Chapter 1
>
> > Fin.
>
> Hmmm ... I know my French is VERY rusty, but I don't think "by" and
> "Chapter" are right. :-)
>
> It is possible to go shorter in English ...
>
> Me by Me
>
> Chapter 1
>
> Me.
>
> ;-)- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
But if you're a Rastafarian:
I and I
Chapter 1
I.
--
Halmyre
--- Synchronet 3.13a-Win32 NewsLink 1.83
|
|
|
Re: Shortest Books Ever Written [message #714 is a reply to message #712] |
Thu, 16 February 2012 10:53 |
Sandman
Messages: 97 Registered: January 2012
Karma: 0
|
Member |
|
|
From Newsgroup: rec.arts.sf.starwars.misc
In article
,
YourName@YourISP.com (Your Name) wrote:
> In article
> , Duggy
> wrote:
>
> > On Feb 15, 3:14=A0pm, YourN...@YourISP.com (Your Name) wrote:
> > > In article , "trotsky"
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > "Why the 'Star Wars' Prequels Are Better Than the Original Trilogy"
> > > > -- headline, Yahoo! News, Feb. 10
> > >
> > > Nope, the shortest book is this one ...
> > >
> > > The End by Me
> > >
> > > Chapter 1
> > > The End
> > >
> > > ;-)
> >
> > Mine is shorter.
> >
> > Fin by moi
> >
> > Chapter 1
> >
> > Fin.
>
> Hmmm ... I know my French is VERY rusty, but I don't think "by" and
> "Chapter" are right. :-)
>
> It is possible to go shorter in English ...
>
>
> Me by Me
>
> Chapter 1
>
> Me.
>
> ;-)
No, this is the shortest:
http://sandman.net/files/end.jpg
--
Sandman[.net]
--- Synchronet 3.13a-Win32 NewsLink 1.83
|
|
|
Re: Shortest Books Ever Written [message #765 is a reply to message #709] |
Thu, 16 February 2012 11:02 |
moviePig
Messages: 17 Registered: February 2012
Karma: 0
|
Junior Member |
|
|
From Newsgroup: rec.arts.sf.starwars.misc
On Feb 15, 11:33 pm, Duggy wrote:
> On Feb 15, 3:14 pm, YourN...@YourISP.com (Your Name) wrote:
>
> > In article , "trotsky"
> > wrote:
>
> > > "Why the 'Star Wars' Prequels Are Better Than the Original Trilogy"
> > > --headline, Yahoo! News, Feb. 10
>
> > Nope, the shortest book is this one ...
>
> > The End by Me
>
> > Chapter 1
> > The End
>
> > ;-)
>
> Mine is shorter.
>
> Fin by moi
>
> Chapter 1
>
> Fin.
That's fine by me.
--
- - - - - - - -
YOUR taste at work...
http://www.moviepig.com
--- Synchronet 3.13a-Win32 NewsLink 1.83
|
|
|
Re: Shortest Books Ever Written [message #766 is a reply to message #714] |
Thu, 16 February 2012 14:56 |
YourName
Messages: 366 Registered: January 2012
Karma: 0
|
Senior Member |
|
|
From Newsgroup: rec.arts.sf.starwars.misc
In article , Sandman
wrote:
>
>
> No, this is the shortest:
>
> http://sandman.net/files/end.jpg
Being a picture really makes it the shortest graphic novel / comic book. ;-)
--- Synchronet 3.13a-Win32 NewsLink 1.83
|
|
|
Re: Shortest Books Ever Written [message #767 is a reply to message #709] |
Thu, 16 February 2012 18:47 |
moviePig
Messages: 17 Registered: February 2012
Karma: 0
|
Junior Member |
|
|
From Newsgroup: rec.arts.sf.starwars.misc
On Feb 16, 2:56 pm, YourN...@YourISP.com (Your Name) wrote:
> In article , Sandman
>
> wrote:
>
> > No, this is the shortest:
>
> > http://sandman.net/files/end.jpg
>
> Being a picture really makes it the shortest graphic novel / comic book. ;-)
Well, it makes it worth a thousand words...
--
- - - - - - - -
YOUR taste at work...
http://www.moviepig.com
--- Synchronet 3.13a-Win32 NewsLink 1.83
|
|
|
Re: Shortest Books Ever Written [message #768 is a reply to message #767] |
Fri, 17 February 2012 00:20 |
YourName
Messages: 366 Registered: January 2012
Karma: 0
|
Senior Member |
|
|
From Newsgroup: rec.arts.sf.starwars.misc
In article
<12306155-5629-42de-bc4d-d59840ab6caf@m7g2000vbw.googlegroups.com>,
moviePig wrote:
> On Feb 16, 2:56=A0pm, YourN...@YourISP.com (Your Name) wrote:
> > In article , Sandman
> >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > No, this is the shortest:
> > >
> > > http://sandman.net/files/end.jpg
> >
> > Being a picture really makes it the shortest graphic novel / comic book. =
> > ;-)
>
> Well, it makes it worth a thousand words...
Which makes it much longer than the other examples. ;-)
--- Synchronet 3.13a-Win32 NewsLink 1.83
|
|
|