Megalextoria
Retro computing and gaming, sci-fi books, tv and movies and other geeky stuff.

Home » Archive » fa.sf-lovers » SF-LOVERS Digest V7 #1
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Switch to threaded view of this topic Create a new topic Submit Reply
SF-LOVERS Digest V7 #1 [message #5213] Sat, 28 July 2012 00:09
Anonymous
Karma:
Originally posted by: utzoo!decvax!ucbvax!sf-lovers
Article-I.D.: ucbvax.7867
Posted: Fri Jul  2 04:06:24 1982
Received: Sat Jul  3 01:26:36 1982

>From JPM@Mit-Ai Fri Jul  2 04:04:00 1982

SF-LOVERS Digest          Friday, 2 Jul 1982        Volume 7 : Issue 1

Today's Topics:
                        SF Fandom - Chicon IV,
            SF Books - The Deceivers & The Eureka Years &
       Where Time Winds Blow & The Jade Enchantress & Ellison &
      The Number of the Beast & "All the Lies That Are My Life",
               SF Topics - SF Ghetto & Politics in SF,
                    Random Topics - Movie ratings
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: 14 Jun 82 20:54:22 EDT  (Mon)
From: Steve Bellovin 
Subject: "The Deceivers"

"The Deceivers", by Alfred Bester, bills itself as "the true successor
to THE STARS MY DESTINATION."  It isn't; rather, it's the true prequel
to Thanksgiving, in that it's a real turkey.

The writing style is very free-flowing, the characters are improbable,
and the plot even more so.  It's filled with blatant and offensive
racial and ethnic stereotypes, and the "science" makes no sense at
all.  But the part likely to offend everyone on this list is a
computer-query sequence.

Think about it -- it's the 27th century, the computers are
semi-sentient and talk among themselves.  So, when the hero wants to
ask his computer (via an EEG-like link) where his true love is, he
says "'Program Problem APB Demi Jeroux Print Absolute Address.'...  He
know that 'an absolute address' in computer circles demanded the exact
storage location where the referenced operand is to be found, and no
weaseling before, behind, between, above, below and out of the
imperative."  Worse than that, the program is in BASIC!  (A partial
listing is included....)

Well, I'm not going to object to Bester buying himself a micro.  Nor 
do I object to it influencing his stories.  But he should try to do a 
better job of it.

Never mind -- the book isn't worth even this much space in the Digest;
I'm only bothering in the hope of sparing other fans of "The Stars My 
Destination" and "The Demolished Man" from wading through this.

                --Steve Bellovin
                University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

------------------------------

Date: 27 Jun 82 2:20-PDT
From: mclure at SRI-UNIX
Subject: sf column

                           SCIENCE FICTION
                          By Roland J. Green
           (c) 1982 Chicago Sun-Times (Field News Service)

    Opinions differ about how old science fiction is. Some aggressive 
types would enroll Homer and Plato among the founding fathers. Others 
prefer Mary Shelley (''Frankenstein'') or Hugo Gernsback (Amazing 
Stories magazine). Few deny that SF has a considerable history. ''The 
Eureka Years,'' edited by Annette McComas (Bantam paperback, $3.50), 
is a valuable contribution to recording that history.
    In 1949 the late J. Francis McComas and Anthony Boucher founded
the Magazine of Fantasy and Science Fiction in Eureka, Calif. During
the first five years until McComas' retirement in 1954, F&SF was
probably the most innovative magazine in the field. It discovered or
developed at least a baker's dozen of new writers, including Richard
Matheson, the late Philip K. Dick, Zenna Henderson, Poul Anderson and
Gordon Dickson, as well as extensively publishing already established 
writers such as L. Sprague de Camp, Theodore Sturgeon and Ray 
Bradbury.
    The book itself is an assortment of stories, articles, 
correspondence, and anecdotes by the editor, McComas' widow. Many of 
the stories are already well-known (what respectable SF collection 
does not have Sturgeon's ''The Hurkle is a Happy Beast''?) or 
significant mostly for what the authors later became. On the other 
hand, there is also a virtually unknown Andre Norton story and Manly 
Wade Wellman's first John the Minstrel story, among other treasures.
    In fact, describing this book rapidly becomes a repetition of 
''among other treasures'' because it is so filled with them. There are
lists of each year's prominent books, in which novels this reviewer
grew up on are hailed as new breakthroughs; one notes that a whole
year in the early 1950s might produce less published SF than a couple
of months in any year since 1978! There are familiar complaints about
how poor distribution is afflicting sales. There is a section of
rejection letters any would-be SF writer or teacher of SF writing
ought to memorize religiously.
    This book, in short, records a notable achievement as well as an
act of faith in the future of American SF when that future was by no 
means assured. The days when such acts were laying the foundations of 
SF are rapidly slipping out of living memory; they badly need 
recording in more books like this one.
    It would be an oversimplification to call Robert Holdstock's
''Where Time Winds Blow'' (TimescapePocket Books, $2.95 paperback) a 
''typical British SF novel.'' However, the emphasis on 
characterization, the literate savoring of language, and the somewhat 
uncertain pacing all seem to be found more often in SF novels that 
start their career on the far side of the Atlantic.
    Holdstock, nonetheless, has made a good book of his two interwoven
stories. One story tells the search for the secret of the Time Winds, 
fierce cyclonic storms that sweep across a far-distant planet's 
surface and snatch cities, machines, and researchers across time. The 
other story is the complex relationship of three of these researchers,
two men and a woman. They emerge both as believable in terms of their
own society and understandable by the book's 20th century readers.
    In E. Hoffman Price's graceful fantasy ''The Jade Enchantress''
(Del ReyBallantine, $2.75 paperback), a minor Chinese goddess begins
the story by seeking a mortal lover, a shrewd young farmer. Price
tells what follows with wit, sympathy for all his characters, a
profound knowledge of T'ang Dynasty China that never slows the brisk
pacing, and a delightful savoring of Chinese philosophy, sexual mores,
magic and cuisine. Along with Price's ''The Devil Wives of Li Fong''
(also a Ballantine paperback), this book recalls the Judge Dee
mysteries of Robert Van Gulik - an extraordinarily effective use of
another time and culture to bring a whole new dimension to an existing
genre.
    This year Chicago plays host to the annual World Science Fiction 
Convention Sept. 2-6 at the Hyatt Regency Chicago. Guests of honor are
Australian writer A. Bertram Chandler, American artist Frank Kelly
Freas, and longtime SF fan Lee Hoffman. Memberships are $50 through
July 15; thereafter $75 at the door. Write Chicon IV, Box A3120,
Chicago, Ill. 60690.

------------------------------

Date: Wed 30-Jun-1982 10:40-EDT
From: Bill Russell 
Subject: The Number of the Beast

I just heard an ad on the radio (WNEW-FM 102.7) for this book by
Heinlein.  It was described as a "new" best-selling mass market
paperback, and as "wicked and wonderfull"!  This is the first time
that I can remember that a SF book has been advertised on radio.  Has
anyone else heard this ad?

------------------------------

Date: 1 Jul 1982 19:04:47 EDT (Thursday)
From: Ralph Muha 
Subject: Ellison's Accident

In one of his recent stories, "All The Lies That Are My Life", 
Ellison tells the tale of an SF author who leaves a videotape will.  
In the story, the author is killed in an automobile accident on an LA
freeway...

------------------------------

Date: 18 Jun 1982 03:54:19-PDT
From: decvax!duke!uok!jejones at Berkeley
Subject: Anthony Villiers

Hmm...I thought that Anthony Villiers was a character (murder victim?)
in the Wendell Urth story "The Dying Night", in *Asimov's Mysteries*.

                                James Jones
                                duke!uok!jejones
                                (formerly ihuxl!jej)


[ This message is in reference to the contribution in volume 5,
  issue 63, describing Anthony Villiers as a character in a series
  by Alexei Panshin. -- Jim ]

------------------------------

Date: 28 June 1982 14:32 est
From: Spratt.Multics at MIT-MULTICS
Subject: Fantasy and Science Fiction authors who hate F&SF.

I recall Harlan Ellison making desperate efforts to dissociate himself
from the SF genre in which he had been so successful.  At the time I
thought it a curious and singular abberation.

Recently, however, I ran across a couple of SF authors who have put
themselves into an even more curious (but related) position.  They are
active SF genre authors who seem to think no one (but themselves, I
suppose) writes SF worth reading.

The first of these I read was George Zebrowski's Macrolife.  It's a
well-written book with a theme encompassing all of time and space.  In
the afterword, Zebrowski explains where the ideas for the book came
from and in the course of this explanation quotes from an essay titled
"Science Fiction is Too Conservative", written in 1961 by everybody's
favorite futurist, G. Harry Stine.  The gist of the quotation is that
most of the really innovative speculation is done outside of the SF
genre.  Zebrowsky goes on to affirm this and state that the situation
is even worse "today" than it was in 1961 (adding a gratuitous "I'm
sorry to say").  The strong implication he makes is that his book,
Macrolife, is different from what everybody else is writing in SF in
that it does speculate innovatively.

The second book is titled "The Golden Nagimata", and it's written by 
Jessical Amanda Salmonson (I'm not sure of the spelling on the name).
She makes her remarks in an afterword, as well.  Her view is that
writers of Fantasy and Science Fiction don't write stories which are
"rich" and "interesting".  She says that, as she desires to write 
stories which are interesting, she doesn't allow other SF authors to
influence her.

The one thing I find really curious in all of this is that I enjoyed
the writings of all three authors.

------------------------------

Date: 28 Jun 82 13:00-PDT
From: mclure at SRI-UNIX
Subject: Re:  Fantasy and Science Fiction authors who hate F&SF.

If you've read enough of Harlan's non-fiction/intros/etc and followed 
him for awhile, you'll see that it is completely reasonable for him to
hate being pigeon-holed.  In fact, it is his trademark to complain 
about such things.  Mainstream authors have done similar things.  
Vladimir Nabokov was ruthlessly anti-critic.  He urged that only his 
readers should try to interpret his work.

Harlan is a versatile author, capable of producing excellent work in 
fantasy, SF, horror, mainstream, and mixings of the genres.  I don't 
see a reason why his books should always appear in the SF section of 
the bookstore.

------------------------------

Date: 28 June 1982 16:32 est
From: Spratt.Multics at MIT-MULTICS
Subject: Re:  Fantasy and Science Fiction authors who hate F&SF.

I guess I failed to make the major thrust of my note clear.  I'm not
so interested in yet another go around of justifications for Ellison's
position.  The more extreme (and arrogant) situation which Zebrowsky
and Salmonson place themselves in is what I find fascinating.  In
fact, I neglected to state the question which all of this was a
lead-up to:  What other authors have stated similar positions?

Certainly, Ellison's position is not particularly similar in that I 
don't re-call him stating that he was the only (or even one of the
very few) who wrote "good" SF.  It \has/ struck me as odd that he,
alone out of a large number of authors, is so strident in his
renunciation of SF-authordom.  Certainly other authors have "suffered"
from being narrowly categorized in SF.  L. Sprague de Camp's
historical fiction must have a much smaller audience than it would if
he weren't known only as an SF author.  Asimov, while quite famous as
an SF author, seems to have done fairly well in both the Mystery and
Science Fact genres, without recourse to bitter soliloquies on current
practices in the publishing industry.  Other, admittedly less potent,
examples of quietly multi-faceted authors come to mind involving
Bradbury, LeGuin, and Wolfe.

It just occurred to me that Vonnegut made some comments about 
dissociating himself from SF.  So, for my second question, did K.  
Vonnegut make such comments, and if so, what did he say?

        Yours in contentiousness,
                Lindsey Leroy Spratt.

------------------------------

Date: 10 Jun 1982 22:26:14-EDT
From: csin!cjh at CCA-UNIX
Subject: Re: political SF

   Oh goody, another topic to flame on!
   To begin with, I was just as disgusted as APPLE at the item I read 
concerning the attempt of a group to produce [progressive SF]. It is 
much too broad to say that politics makes bad fiction; let's try 
modifying that to read "codified politics makes bad fiction". I can't 
answer for all of the writers nominated by Minow, but I would observe 
that in all of their works that I am familiar with the quality is
related to the subordination of [politics] to plot. Shaw's best
material, for instance, reflects individual human concerns; the pieces
that try to follow any political \doctrine/ are frequently awkward and
dull. (Similarly, Sturgeon claims not to have originated the remark
that Wells sold his birthright for a pot of message.) This is true
even of Brunner; when he tries to get a message across, he gets
boring.
   The thing that particularly appalled me about this group (Red
Shift, I think they called themselves---what an obviously one-sided
name) is that their public utterances, as quoted, show a severe
ignorance of much of SF. To consider Heinlein, Asimov, and Doc Smith
as representative of the whole field (and to call Asimov a
militarist!) is show the shallowness of one's knowledge.

------------------------------

Date: 27 Jun 1982 1404-EDT
From: John R. Covert 
Subject: R-13

How do you tell the difference between a 12- and a 13-year-old?  Few 
of them, except military dependents, have any form of identification.
R isn't enforced very well either, but R-13 would be unenforceable 
unless the movie industry wanted to issue ID cards.

The whole system is voluntary, anyway.  R seems to vary between "under
16 and under 18" not allowed from place to place, anyway.  Does anyone
know if any towns/states have ordinances/laws requiring theatres to 
enforce the R-limit?


[ This message is in reference to the contribution in volume 5,
  issue 63, on the controversy surrounding the rating of the movie
  Poltergeist -- Jim ]

------------------------------

End of SF-LOVERS Digest
***********************


  Switch to threaded view of this topic Create a new topic Submit Reply
Previous Topic: SF-LOVERS Digest V6 #1
Next Topic: SF-LOVERS Digest V6 #1
Goto Forum:
  

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Fri Mar 29 07:55:20 EDT 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01671 seconds