Megalextoria
Retro computing and gaming, sci-fi books, tv and movies and other geeky stuff.

Home » Archive » fa.sf-lovers » SF-LOVERS Digest V5 #63
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Switch to threaded view of this topic Create a new topic Submit Reply
SF-LOVERS Digest V5 #63 [message #5198] Sat, 28 July 2012 00:09
Anonymous
Karma:
Originally posted by: utzoo!decvax!ucbvax!sf-lovers
Article-I.D.: ucbvax.7565
Posted: Tue Jun  8 11:16:00 1982
Received: Wed Jun  9 01:34:53 1982

>From JPM@Mit-Ai Tue Jun  8 11:15:35 1982

SF-LOVERS Digest          Sunday, 6 Jun 1982       Volume 5 : Issue 63

Today's Topics:
                  Administrivia - Duplicate Digests,
                SF Books - "Shortstack" & Macro Story,
     SF TV - Dr Who,  SF Movies - Star Trek: The Wrath of Khan &
             Rating of Poltergeist & Revenge of the Jedi,
                SF Topics - Science in the Public Eye,
                   Humor - Genderless Video Games,
            Random Topics - Duck's Breath Mystery Theater
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Sunday, June 6, 1982 6:23AM
From: Jim McGrath (The Moderator) 
Reply-to: SF-LOVERS-REQUEST at MIT-AI
Subject: Duplicate Digests

Once again, because of those transmission difficulties mentioned a
couple of weeks ago, a few people were sent duplicate copies of issue
61 (Friday's digest).  Sorry about that.

Jim

------------------------------

Date: 02-Jun-1982
From: ANDY VESPER at EVE
Reply-to: "ANDY VESPER at EVE c/o" 
Subject: Looking for a story

Does anyone know where the following story might be found?  (magazine,
anthology, etc)

The title is "Shortstack" or something similar and it is about a man 
named Short. The story begins as he is inflating a plastic hut in the 
desert - but the plastic was cut wrong and instead of a hut he gets a 
chimney - the 'stack' of the title.  The rest of the story shows how 
useful this is and why Short is billed as a savior by mankind.

I read this at least 10 years ago so I don't remember just where I 
read it - I think in a mainstream anthology.  Does anybody recognize 
it?

Thanks, Andy

PS: I am also waiting for \The Universal Pantograph/ by Alexei Panshin
- it is the fourth in a series about a Trog named Torve and a human 
named Anthony Villiers (aka Viscount Charteris) - light fare but 
refreshing.

------------------------------

Date: 4 June 1982 10:48 edt
From: Gubbins.4506i14TK at RADC-Multics
Subject: Macro Story


     The following is a story story that a good friend of mine wrote.
I thought it might fit in well with SF-Lovers.
                                          - Gern

       --------------------------------------------------------


     "Rats!", the Moon thought, "My Kepler crater itches!"
     He hated it when he had an itch.  There was no way of relieving 
it unless a small meteorite would strike the spot.  And the chances of
that happening were millions to one.
     The Moon remembered his youth, when he had thought about more
than tiny itches.  He had been cradled in a lush pocket of spacetime,
set in ultimate comfort among the cosmos.  He took leisurely strolls
around a beautiful blue planet, admiring its grace and purity.
     Yet something was missing; a purpose, a reason.
     Was this his ultimate fate, to circle this epitome of beauty?  
Was his sole purpose to praise and serve this model of perfection?
     He had certainly hoped not.
     As time passed,, he grew to hate the blue planet, jealous of the
attention it drew and magnificence it possessed.  He hated his own
mundane looks and meaningless purpose in life.
     Then they came.  Tiny, miniature creatures in white.  They hopped
around and stuck a bright cloth in him.  They danced, they shouted,
they frolicked.  They sang praises to him!
     Praises to him?  Creatures from the beautiful blue planet singing
praises to him, an ugly rock, a mere servant?  Maybe he was important.
Maybe he had a purpose in life.
     He was a goal!  Something to reach for, something to accomplish.
He had found his purpose.
     Suddenly a tiny asteroid pelted the Moon just inside the Kepler
crater.
     "Ahh!", sighed the Moon, "That hits the spot."
     And so it did.



                                        - Aries

------------------------------

Date: 4 Jun 1982 0931-MDT
From: Michi Wada 
Subject: Dr. Who and Star Trek II premier

In the story "The Armaggedon Factor" the Doctor met Drax, a fellow 
Gallifrian.  Drax called the Doctor "Theta Sigma" when they first met.
According to the book version of the story "Theta Sigma" is a
Gallifrian designation and not the Doctor's real name either.  Other
than that one instance he has always been just "The Doctor".

Albuquerque, New Mexico also had a premier showing of Star Trek II on
3 June '82.  This one was sponsored by a radio station here in 
Albuquerque.  Tickets were for free, but were gotten by answering or
asking Star Trek trivia questions or being in one of 2 science fiction
clubs who got a limited number of tickets for helping out with the
promotion.

------------------------------

Date: 4 Jun 1982 0915-MDT
From: Pendleton at UTAH-20 (Bob Pendleton)
Subject: Star Trek:TWOK premier

   I attended what has billed as the premier of ST:TWOK last night, 
Thursday June 3rd, in Salt Lake City, Utah.  It was not billed as the
world premier, just as the premier.  It was part of a promotion by a
local radio station and a local furniture dealler.

Bye the way, I haven't enjoyed an SF movie so much since the first
Star Wars movie.  It was classic Star Trek!

     Bob Pendleton

------------------------------

Date: 4 Jun 1982 08:53 CDT
From: Johnston.DLOS at PARC-MAXC
Subject: Re: SF-LOVERS Digest   V5 #60

No premier on 3 June in Dallas.

Rick

------------------------------

Date: "3-JUN-1982 17:30  "
From: TSC::COORS::VICKREY
Reply-to: "TSC::COORS::VICKREY c/o" 
Subject: The Wrath of Khan

"Somewhere at the ends of the universe a battle is about to begin ..."

So begins the radio commercial for TWOK.  What a lovely way to wake up
in the morning!

------------------------------

Date: 4 Jun 1982 2014-EDT
From: HEDRICK at RUTGERS (Mgr DEC-20s/Dir LCSR Comp Facility)
Subject: an alarming review of ST.TMP.2

After seeing all the positive reviews that have been published here, I
was interested to hear the WCBS movie critic give a fairly negative 
review of Star Trek II.  What was interesting about it was that he 
criticized the movie by saying that it was just a bunch of people 
sitting around in swivel chairs.  Even that were true (which it is
not), I would find it a fairly alarming reaction.  Star Wars (which as
I recall the same reviewer liked) of course had more different sets
and more "action".  But these days more and more of the real life
challenges are going to occur to people who are sitting at desks or
consoles.  If we are going to survive as a technological society, we
are going to be willing to put effort into challenges that are
essentially abstract - ethical issues that we can only see by perusing
a list of numbers on a printout, and life and death struggles that
show up only on a display screen.

I think what we see in that review is the sort of alienation from 
technology that Pirsig analysed so well in @i[Zen and the Art of 
Motorcycle Maintenance].  [I trust everyone on this mailing list knows
about that most extrodinary book.  Although it is a work of fiction,
it contains interesting discussions of at least the following points:
  - people's reactions to technology
  - esthetics
  - the problem-solving process, with emphasis on debugging.  [the
        only other significant treatment that I know of outside the
        AI literature is Polyani's book @i[How to Solve it.]  It isn't
exactly science fiction, but it seems to share many of the merits of
science fiction.  It is one of the few books that seems to create its
own genre.  The normal sorts of things you expect to see in a review
wouldn't be that useful, because the action is almost completely on
the level of ideas.  The chief villain is an academic department at 
the University of Chicago.  [Interestingly enough, I believe that the 
department actually exists.  One suspects that the usual disavowal of 
"no similarity to any people living or dead" is misleading in this
case.  He minces no words about who his villains are.  They are mostly
universities, and they are all identifiable.]]]

------------------------------

Date: 4 Jun 1982 0108-PDT
From: Jim McGrath 
Subject: Rating of Poltergeist


                          By ALJEAN HARMETZ
                   c. 1982 N.Y. Times News Service

    HOLLYWOOD - The voluntary movie-rating system of the Hollywood 
studios has made news again - in two ways that reflect the tensions 
inherent in trying to protect children, movie grosses and an 
uncensored society at the same time.  ....
    On the other side of the ledger, MGM-UA's ''Poltergeist,'' a movie
that has a very explicit body count of decaying corpses, was rated R 
by the industry's Rating Board. Because ''Poltergeist'' - which 
concerns the ghostly possession of a tract house and its occupants - 
should find its greatest audience in young teen-agers when it opens 
Friday, the studio appealed the decision.
    By a surprisingly lopsided vote, the Appeals Board, which consists
of 24 members of organizations of movie producers and distributors and
theater owners, overturned the R-rating and granted ''Poltergeist'' a
PG-rating.
    In the last three years, only three of 16 appeals have been
granted by the Appeals Board - not counting movies that appealed their
ratings because of sexually explicit language that automatically gets 
a movie an R.
    The PG-rating for ''Poltergeist'' suggests ''parental guidance''
but allows even a 5-year-old to attend the movie unaccompanied. The 
ratings system was instituted in 1968 as a way of staving off 
government censorship. For the last six or eight years, there has been
a fierce but almost completely private argument inside the industry
over adding an R-13 rating, which would restrict a movie for young
children but not for teen-agers. Jack Valenti, president of the Motion
Picture Association of America, has been very reluctant to draw
attention to the ratings by tampering with them in any way, but the
rerating of ''Poltergeist'' is bound to force him to address himself
to the hot-potato issue once again.

 ....

------------------------------

Date: 4 Jun 1982 1600-EDT
From: DD-B 
Reply-to: "DYER-BENNET at KL2137 c/o" 
Subject: SFL submission


( Subject: SF-LOVERS Digest V5 #57 )

(Dolata at SUMEX-AIM) I agree that revenge does not befit a Jedhi.  
They certainly don't map directly onto the samurai, for example.

There are more long books recently, and also more series and sequels 
and the like.  Personally, I like long books and series.  I would 
certainly object if I felt a book were padded, but that's not 
something I tend to notice (or else my definition of "padded" differs 
from most peoples').  So be reassured that this trend in writing or 
publishing at least serves the interests of someone, somewhere, other 
than those doing it.

(Discussions of "standard english") This is more germane to SF than 
many of our sidetracks here, but I think it's also more unresolvable.
Using female pronouns generically in a book told in first person by a 
female bothers me much less, at least in the abstract (I haven't read 
Friday yet), than many things I've seen done.

( Subject: SF-LOVERS Digest V5 #59 )

(Steven J. Zeve ) I thought it was pachuperoffspring?

------------------------------

Date: 4 Jun 1982 1328-PDT
From: FEBER at USC-ISIC
Subject: Pacman

The name Pacman apparently comes from the Japanese verb "paku-paku" 
which is an onomatopoetic word representing the sound the lips make as
someone gobbles food.  It implies voraciousness.

------------------------------

Date: 26-May-1982
From: JOHN FRANCIS AT EIFFEL
Reply-to: "JOHN FRANCIS AT EIFFEL c/o" 
Subject: Ferrets of Old England

In reply to Mijjil's ferret query:  I have never heard of "Duck's 
Breath", but I suspect that your question about the ferrets of England
refers to "The Ferrets of Old England", a truly marvelous song.  I 
don't remember much of it - just the following phrase:

        "Do you like your Ferret baked or boiled?"
        "No - I preFERRET raw!"
        "Oh, God bless the Ferrets of Old England".

This song is from an old BBC radio series "I'm sorry, I'll read that 
again" starring David Hatch, Jo Kendall, John (Otto) Cleese, Tim 
Brooke-Taylor, Graham Garden, and Bill Oddie (who wrote the songs), 
and produced by Humphrey Barclay. Ferrets are a recurring theme in 
this series, as are gibbons, and several other weird things.  If you 
haven't ever heard this series, you are missing a lot of the jokes in 
the Monty Python TV shows and films. For example, in "Monty Python and
the Holy Grail", the vampire rabbit is a reference to an ISIRTA show 
where the wimpy hero (Tim Brooke-Taylor) is trapped in a room with a 
vampire rabbit and a large wooden chest.

"Oh" he dithers, "Should I attempt to kill the creature by driving a 
pointed stick through it's heart, or should I hide in the chest ?"

"What should I do ?"

and the audience reply

        "Stake the Bunny!"  "Hop in the Box!"


P.S.  Referring to the show as ISIRTA is not just SFL-ism in
      abbreviating everything to it's initials - that's what they
      called it themselves.

------------------------------

End of SF-LOVERS Digest
***********************
  Switch to threaded view of this topic Create a new topic Submit Reply
Previous Topic: SF-LOVERS Digest V5 #52
Next Topic: SF-LOVERS Digest V5 #62
Goto Forum:
  

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Thu Mar 28 07:30:31 EDT 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.09036 seconds