| FOR THE RECORD [message #89188] |
Sun, 23 June 2013 04:00  |
ToolPackinMama
Messages: 302
Registered: July 2012
Karma: 0
|
Senior Member |
|
|
For the record:
I do NOT assert that Kirk and Spock are gay lovers. I assert that an
argument in favor of that view is legitimate fodder for discussion and
debate.
|
|
|
|
| Re: FOR THE RECORD [message #89198 is a reply to message #89188] |
Sun, 23 June 2013 06:01  |
Daniel47@teranews.com
Messages: 188
Registered: August 2012
Karma: 0
|
Senior Member |
|
|
ToolPackinMama wrote:
> For the record:
>
> I do NOT assert that Kirk and Spock are gay lovers. I assert that an
> argument in favor of that view is legitimate fodder for discussion and
> debate.
Gee Whiz, TPM, what's caused this change in your attitude??
I would have thought you were addiment that they *were* gay, not that
they *might* be gay!!
Daniel
|
|
|
|
| Re: FOR THE RECORD [message #89270 is a reply to message #89198] |
Sun, 23 June 2013 17:22 |
Wiseguy
Messages: 242
Registered: February 2012
Karma: 0
|
Senior Member |
|
|
"Daniel47@teranews.com" <dxmm@albury.nospam.net.au> wrote in
news:3Izxt.37329$N36.32918@newsfe27.iad:
> ToolPackinMama wrote:
>> For the record:
>>
>> I do NOT assert that Kirk and Spock are gay lovers. I assert that an
>> argument in favor of that view is legitimate fodder for discussion and
>> debate.
>
> Gee Whiz, TPM, what's caused this change in your attitude??
>
> I would have thought you were addiment that they *were* gay, not that
> they *might* be gay!!
>
> Daniel
>
>
>
adamant!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!
|
|
|
|
| Re: FOR THE RECORD [message #89291 is a reply to message #89270] |
Mon, 24 June 2013 03:21 |
Daniel47@teranews.com
Messages: 188
Registered: August 2012
Karma: 0
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Wiseguy wrote:
> "Daniel47@teranews.com" <dxmm@albury.nospam.net.au> wrote in
> news:3Izxt.37329$N36.32918@newsfe27.iad:
>
>> ToolPackinMama wrote:
>>> For the record:
>>>
>>> I do NOT assert that Kirk and Spock are gay lovers. I assert that an
>>> argument in favor of that view is legitimate fodder for discussion and
>>> debate.
>>
>> Gee Whiz, TPM, what's caused this change in your attitude??
>>
>> I would have thought you were addiment that they *were* gay, not that
>> they *might* be gay!!
>>
>> Daniel
>>
>>
>>
>
> adamant!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!
>
Hey, I was fairly sure "addiment" was wrong, but "adamant" looks wronger!!
Daniel
|
|
|
|
| Re: FOR THE RECORD [message #89929 is a reply to message #89291] |
Mon, 24 June 2013 19:27 |
Bast
Messages: 151
Registered: August 2012
Karma: 0
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Daniel47@teranews.com wrote:
> Wiseguy wrote:
>> "Daniel47@teranews.com" <dxmm@albury.nospam.net.au> wrote in
>> news:3Izxt.37329$N36.32918@newsfe27.iad:
>>
>>> ToolPackinMama wrote:
>>>> For the record:
>>>>
>>>> I do NOT assert that Kirk and Spock are gay lovers. I assert that an
>>>> argument in favor of that view is legitimate fodder for discussion
>>>> and debate.
>>>
>>> Gee Whiz, TPM, what's caused this change in your attitude??
>>>
>>> I would have thought you were addiment that they *were* gay, not that
>>> they *might* be gay!!
>>>
>>> Daniel
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> adamant!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!
>>
>
> Hey, I was fairly sure "addiment" was wrong, but "adamant" looks
> wronger!!
> Daniel
You're both wrong.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adam_Ant
wikipedia NEVER LIES. ;p
Mind you what a washed-up has-been rockstar has to do with TPM or Star Trek
? ....I'll never know.
|
|
|
|
| Re: FOR THE RECORD [message #90680 is a reply to message #89929] |
Tue, 25 June 2013 11:08 |
Daniel47@teranews.com
Messages: 188
Registered: August 2012
Karma: 0
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Bast wrote:
> Daniel47@teranews.com wrote:
>> Wiseguy wrote:
>>> "Daniel47@teranews.com" <dxmm@albury.nospam.net.au> wrote in
>>> news:3Izxt.37329$N36.32918@newsfe27.iad:
>>>
>>>> ToolPackinMama wrote:
>>>> > For the record:
>>>> >
>>>> > I do NOT assert that Kirk and Spock are gay lovers. I assert that an
>>>> > argument in favor of that view is legitimate fodder for discussion
>>>> > and debate.
>>>>
>>>> Gee Whiz, TPM, what's caused this change in your attitude??
>>>>
>>>> I would have thought you were addiment that they *were* gay, not that
>>>> they *might* be gay!!
>>>>
>>>> Daniel
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> adamant!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!
>>>
>>
>> Hey, I was fairly sure "addiment" was wrong, but "adamant" looks
>> wronger!!
>> Daniel
>
>
>
>
> You're both wrong.
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adam_Ant
>
> wikipedia NEVER LIES. ;p
> Mind you what a washed-up has-been rockstar has to do with TPM or Star Trek
> ? ....I'll never know.
Oh, come on, Bast!! Not everyone here would remember him!!
Daniel
|
|
|
|
| Re: FOR THE RECORD [message #90952 is a reply to message #89291] |
Tue, 25 June 2013 19:29 |
Wiseguy
Messages: 242
Registered: February 2012
Karma: 0
|
Senior Member |
|
|
"Daniel47@teranews.com" <dxmm@albury.nospam.net.au> wrote in
news:ErSxt.90759$5i1.36534@newsfe15.iad:
> Wiseguy wrote:
>> "Daniel47@teranews.com" <dxmm@albury.nospam.net.au> wrote in
>> news:3Izxt.37329$N36.32918@newsfe27.iad:
>>
>>> ToolPackinMama wrote:
>>>> For the record:
>>>>
>>>> I do NOT assert that Kirk and Spock are gay lovers. I assert that
>>>> an argument in favor of that view is legitimate fodder for
>>>> discussion and debate.
>>>
>>> Gee Whiz, TPM, what's caused this change in your attitude??
>>>
>>> I would have thought you were addiment that they *were* gay, not
>>> that they *might* be gay!!
>>>
>>> Daniel
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
adamant!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!
>> !!
>>
>
> Hey, I was fairly sure "addiment" was wrong, but "adamant" looks
> wronger!!
>
> Daniel
>
>
You might try looking it up. Ever hear of a dictionary? or even
Google.
|
|
|
|
| Re: FOR THE RECORD [message #92011 is a reply to message #90952] |
Wed, 26 June 2013 06:42 |
Daniel47@teranews.com
Messages: 188
Registered: August 2012
Karma: 0
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Wiseguy wrote:
> "Daniel47@teranews.com" <dxmm@albury.nospam.net.au> wrote in
> news:ErSxt.90759$5i1.36534@newsfe15.iad:
>
>> Wiseguy wrote:
>>> "Daniel47@teranews.com" <dxmm@albury.nospam.net.au> wrote in
>>> news:3Izxt.37329$N36.32918@newsfe27.iad:
>>>
>>>> ToolPackinMama wrote:
>>>> > For the record:
>>>> >
>>>> > I do NOT assert that Kirk and Spock are gay lovers. I assert that
>>>> > an argument in favor of that view is legitimate fodder for
>>>> > discussion and debate.
>>>>
>>>> Gee Whiz, TPM, what's caused this change in your attitude??
>>>>
>>>> I would have thought you were addiment that they *were* gay, not
>>>> that they *might* be gay!!
>>>>
>>>> Daniel
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
> adamant!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!
>>> !!
>>>
>>
>> Hey, I was fairly sure "addiment" was wrong, but "adamant" looks
>> wronger!!
>>
>> Daniel
>>
>>
>
> You might try looking it up. Ever hear of a dictionary? or even
> Google.
No not that one!!! O.K., you've shamed me into dragging out the
"Roget's Thesaurus" (and glasses!!) to find that the word I meant to
type above was "adamant"!!
Daniel
|
|
|
|
| Re: FOR THE RECORD [message #92014 is a reply to message #90680] |
Wed, 26 June 2013 09:29 |
Bast
Messages: 151
Registered: August 2012
Karma: 0
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Daniel47@teranews.com wrote:
> Bast wrote:
>> Daniel47@teranews.com wrote:
>>> Wiseguy wrote:
>>>> "Daniel47@teranews.com" <dxmm@albury.nospam.net.au> wrote in
>>>> news:3Izxt.37329$N36.32918@newsfe27.iad:
>>>>
>>>> > ToolPackinMama wrote:
>>>> >> For the record:
>>>> >>
>>>> >> I do NOT assert that Kirk and Spock are gay lovers. I assert that
>>>> >> an argument in favor of that view is legitimate fodder for
>>>> >> discussion and debate.
>>>> >
>>>> > Gee Whiz, TPM, what's caused this change in your attitude??
>>>> >
>>>> > I would have thought you were addiment that they *were* gay, not
>>>> > that they *might* be gay!!
>>>> >
>>>> > Daniel
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>> adamant!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!
>>>>
>>>
>>> Hey, I was fairly sure "addiment" was wrong, but "adamant" looks
>>> wronger!!
>>> Daniel
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> You're both wrong.
>>
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adam_Ant
>>
>> wikipedia NEVER LIES. ;p
>> Mind you what a washed-up has-been rockstar has to do with TPM or Star
>> Trek ? ....I'll never know.
>
> Oh, come on, Bast!! Not everyone here would remember him!!
>
> Daniel
Well then, how about THIS ONE ?,.....
http://hanna-barbera.wikia.com/wiki/Atom_Ant
|
|
|
|
Members
Search
Help
Register
Login
Home
