Megalextoria
Retro computing and gaming, sci-fi books, tv and movies and other geeky stuff.

Home » Archive » net.micro.apple » Re: UNIX on Lisa (Partial FLAME)
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Switch to threaded view of this topic Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: UNIX on Lisa (Partial FLAME) [message #76081] Wed, 29 May 2013 20:01
guy is currently offline  guy
Messages: 73
Registered: February 2013
Karma: 0
Member
Message-ID: <208@rlgvax.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 18-Oct-84 18:19:55 EDT
Article-I.D.: rlgvax.208
Posted: Thu Oct 18 18:19:55 1984
Date-Received: Sat, 20-Oct-84 06:51:27 EDT
References: <1354@pucc-h> <10@leopard.UUCP>
Organization: CCI Office Systems Group, Reston, VA
Lines: 18

 >  	XENIX IS NOT A SYSTEM 3 UNIX!!!!!!!!!!
 >  
 >  It is far closer to a version of BSD than BTL, and BSD does not claim
 >  to be SYSIII or later.

It may be a version of V7, which *was* issued by BTL.  It is not the case
that all UNIX versions that aren't BTL, or USG, or USDL, or System
 are BSD versions.

 >  A friend of mine has obtained a copy of XENIX for the IBM-PC after my
 >  warning him not to, after trying to get it to stay up for more than
 >  a few minutes he is reformatting his hard drive and sticking to PCDOS.
 >  At least Microsoft wrote something that works.

Err, umm... XENIX *is* a Microsoft product...

	Guy Harris
	{seismo,ihnp4,allegra}!rlgvax!guy
  Switch to threaded view of this topic Create a new topic Submit Reply
Previous Topic: Mac 512k digital board ROMs
Next Topic: Summary of Responses: MAC wrist watch cursor
Goto Forum:
  

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Tue Apr 23 05:10:58 EDT 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.04799 seconds