Megalextoria
Retro computing and gaming, sci-fi books, tv and movies and other geeky stuff.

Home » Archive » net.micro.cbm » "@0:" vs "@:"
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Switch to threaded view of this topic Create a new topic Submit Reply
"@0:" vs "@:" [message #66840] Sun, 19 May 2013 23:24
Anonymous
Karma:
Originally posted by: wanttaja@ssc-vax.UUCP (Ronald J Wanttaja)
Message-ID: <198@ssc-vax.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 11-Jun-84 19:08:38 EDT
Article-I.D.: ssc-vax.198
Posted: Mon Jun 11 19:08:38 1984
Date-Received: Tue, 12-Jun-84 23:48:15 EDT
Organization: Boeing Aerospace, Seattle
Lines: 13

<  ** COMMODORE BASIC V2.0 **>
       38911 BYTES FREE

Regarding the use of "@0:" vs. "@:" for the save and replace function,
I used the "@0:" method for almost a year before I had a directory
trashed.  I rarely use seqential or other types of files other than
PRG, so that might have something to do with it, too.  Incidentally,
that first directory trash only occured AFTER Compute had a short 
blurb on it... makes ya wonder, doesn't it....?

			    Ron Wanttaja
			    (ssc-vax!wanttaja)
			      
  Switch to threaded view of this topic Create a new topic Submit Reply
Previous Topic: Timeworks Data Manager and Data Manager II
Next Topic: new commodore computers: plus/4 and model 16
Goto Forum:
  

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Sun Sep 22 15:58:05 EDT 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00230 seconds