Megalextoria
Retro computing and gaming, sci-fi books, tv and movies and other geeky stuff.

Home » General Discussion » News and Politics » Democrat Admits Background Checks Won't Work -- Wants to Pass It Anyway
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Switch to threaded view of this topic Create a new topic Submit Reply
Democrat Admits Background Checks Won't Work -- Wants to Pass It Anyway [message #51359] Tue, 30 April 2013 10:00
CyberkNight is currently offline  CyberkNight
Messages: 1499
Registered: July 2012
Karma: 0
Senior Member
Though she still supports stricter gun control measures, Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY), in a rare moment of honesty from the anti-gun crowd, admitted to the The New York Times that the Manchin-Toomey amendment, which would expand background checks to gun shows and online gun sales, wouldn't stop criminals from obtaining a firearm for nefarious purposes.

[A] separate gun measure, an anti-trafficking bill, is the subject of talks between Senator Kirsten E. Gillibrand, Democrat of New York, and two Republican senators who voted no on the background check bill. The Republicans, Senators Kelly Ayotte of New Hampshire and Charles E. Grassley of Iowa, are discussing ways they might support the bill, which would criminalize the shipping or transfer of guns to someone who is barred from possessing a firearm.
[...]
"I think trafficking can be the base of the bill, the rock on which everything else stands," Ms. Gillibrand said. "I also think it's complementary to background checks because, let's be honest, criminals aren't going to buy a gun and go through a background check. So if you really want to go after criminals, you have to have to do both."

Criminals don't obey laws -- that's why they're criminals. Over at Reason, Jacob Sullum points out that the push for new gun control laws, though they won't really reduce instances of gun violence, is basically a publicity stunt; what he calls the "appearance of doing something."

Sullum writes that the trafficking proposal is just an example of overcriminalization. "That seems a bit redundant, since transferring a gun to someone you know or have reasonable cause to believe falls into a prohibited category is already a felony, punishable by up to 10 years in prison," wrote Sullum. "Apparently Gillibrand wants to make it even more illegal, which she says is 'complementary to background checks.' There you have the theory underlying the gun controls favored by President Obama in a nutshell: None of these measures on its own will do anything to reduce crime, but if we pass them all together...well, they still won't do anything, but they will create the appearance of doing something."

Full article: http://www.unitedliberty.org/articles/13493-democrat-admits- background-checks-wont-work-wants-to-pass-it-anyway


  Switch to threaded view of this topic Create a new topic Submit Reply
Previous Topic: Politics: Everything is Rigged: The Biggest Financial Scandal Yet
Next Topic: Ron Paul: Police manhunt for Boston Marathon bombing suspect scarier than attack
Goto Forum:
  

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Sun Aug 20 17:13:17 EDT 2017

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00718 seconds