Megalextoria
Retro computing and gaming, sci-fi books, tv and movies and other geeky stuff.

Home » Sci-Fi/Fantasy » Babylon 5 » uncdan: fuckyeahb5: doughtier: (B5, S3E03 - A Day in the... (FY Babylon 5 (Tumblr))
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Switch to threaded view of this topic Create a new topic Submit Reply
uncdan: fuckyeahb5: doughtier: (B5, S3E03 - A Day in the... [message #37960] Sun, 17 February 2013 11:31
Anonymous
Karma:




















uncdan:

fuckyeahb5:

doughtier:

(B5, S3E03 - A Day in the Strife)

Londo: You know, I was thinking of visiting your world sometime soon. I couldn’t really get a good look at it the last time I was in the area. Do you think it would be safe for someone such as myself to visit your world now?

Na’Far: Yes, quite safe.

A show of dominance.

I saw a reblog of this on my personal blog that mentioned in the tags that they liked Na’Far and they wished we’d seen more of him.

Let’s talk about Na’Far.

Na’Far is a good man, trying to fight an old battle in a new way. It’s clear that this is different than when they first drove the Centauri off of Narn, that the old rebellion coupled with a war of attrition isn’t going to work this time, that they have to fight smarter, and better. G’Kar’s an old veteran of the rebellions and it seems, and certainly all signs point to it as he has yet to have his epiphany at this point, that he is arming the Narns for a resistance which, according to the terms of the surrender, would result in the death of thousands of Narns for every Centauri they kill.

Even knowing that his actions would lead to the death of the last of the Kah’Ri, the only true leader the Narn have he believes that it is better to fight more subtly and that the death of one Narn is worth saving thousands.

And yet, the way that ‘A Day in the Strife” portrays him, he’s the bad guy. Not Londo (well he is but not in the same way), but Na’Far. He’s portrayed as a collaborator. Which we all know the implications of.

So this feeds back into the likes of the Second World War, where members of Nazi occupied countries would work with and for the Nazis for personal gain.

But Na’Far clearly isn’t like that, no one comes out on top in Centauri occupied Narn. It seems to me that he genuinely believes that this is best for the survival of his people, and to be honest I don’t think he’s wrong.

I mean we want him to fail because well, G’Kar’s our guy, we’ve been with him these past 2 years and we want to see him, help his people. But looking at it from the outside, regardless of the orders of the Kah’Ri, it looks like he is staying on Babylon 5 out of fear, and that others are rallying to his cause because of a cult of personality, one that could lead to the extermination of the Narn as a species.

And yet Na’Far is the bad guy. I don’t think it’s entirely fair, and it seems to be a quirk of the direction more than the script, but his entire role in that episode is much deeper than we see and I think it was a missed opportunity, that belies how bad things must really be on Narn.

I also think we should of seen a little bit more of him.

But I worry that he was executed for his failure.

The idea of collaboration, throughout history, is a problematic one. People generally like the attribute of loyalty and courage in the face of evil or whatever, evil being defined as “the other guy.” 

So even in the Second World War, people who cooperated with the Nazis were a mixed bunch: some just wanted to help their people, some found personal gain, and some were previously marginalized ethnic groups who found power after invasion. 

Croats, for example, had little recognition as an ethnic group in Yugoslavia until the German invasion allowed them to take authority as a proxy.

History, regarding collaborators, is written by the victors.  We admire the French resistance now, but only because we were able to liberate them. We do less to admire the Polish Free Army, because they were slaughtered as the Russians waited across the river from Warsaw. 

So yes, I agree. Na’Far is given a bit of a bad light in this episode, despite that, taking the big picture of things, G’kar just doesn’t know what things are really like on Narn and doesn’t know what his actions of resistance cost his people. 

G’kar believes in the long term goal of freedom through sacrifice, Na’Far believes that the cost of that sacrifice is too high. As things develop, it’s G’kar’s own personal sacrifice, in his deal with Londo, which frees Narn, not the sacrifice of Narns themselves. 

In a way, I suppose, you could argue that G’kar really does fulfill the role of a distant rebel, the distance of which makes it easier to espouse resistance because he’s not necessarily facing the dangers and occupation directly, no matter how empathic he is.

This sort of ideological dispute between whether collaboration or resistance work better doesn’t fully get resolved in this, again because in the end it’s G’Kar’s deal with Londo which frees Narn… but it’s also unanswerable in real life. 

Had to post this again for the fantastic commentary here.

  Switch to threaded view of this topic Create a new topic Submit Reply
Previous Topic: doughtier: (B5, S3E03 - A Day in the Strife) Londo: You...
Next Topic: murpworks: ‘A Kawasaki Ninja ZX11 vintage 1992…’ Babylon 5 -...
Goto Forum:
  

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Thu Mar 28 04:16:16 EDT 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.04970 seconds