| ST:Picard questions [message #406187] |
Sun, 16 February 2020 17:04  |
|
|
Originally posted by: Faux Dameron
I've always wants to see a series with scenes of people in the Star Trek
universe living real lives outside of Starfleet and now we have it, but it
doesn't make sense.
I'm not going to get into the economic questions. That's a huge issue, but I
do want to point out something that seem to me missing.
1. Where is Lore's body? If they needed a fully working android, they could
have studied him to learn how to create a new body for Data's consciousness.
2. What happened to Juliana Tainer? (aka Data's Mother). Surely her secret
would have been known by Starfleet via official ship logs. Even if they
decided not to tell her, when/if she "died" she could have been studied.
3. Why beam attackers into Dahj's apartment when they could have just beamed
her into a shielded cell? Even with her android Kung Fu, speed, and
strength, she couldn't break through shields. They could have even just
beamed out her head. Sure, that's nasty but it would have given them access
to her brain without needed to worry if she would fight them.
This group is probably dead but the #1 way to bring back usenet is to use
it.
|
|
|
|
| Re: ST:Picard questions [message #406188 is a reply to message #406187] |
Sun, 16 February 2020 22:30  |
|
|
Originally posted by: Daniel60
Faux Dameron wrote on 17/02/2020 9:04 AM:
<Snip>
> This group is probably dead but the #1 way to bring back usenet is to use
> it.
Not having seen Star Trek:Picard (I'm in Australia and don't have Pay
T.V.!), I cannot answer your specific questions, but I do agree with
your last statement.
If I were to have a question about (unseen) Star Trek:Picard, it would
be along the lines of ..... As I understand it, this series is based
*AFTER* Picard has left Starfleet, so why is it called *Star Trek* at all??
Just to get the Fan Base viewing, I guess!
--
Daniel
|
|
|
|
| Re: ST:Picard questions [message #406189 is a reply to message #406188] |
Wed, 19 February 2020 23:22 |
g8orboe
Messages: 20
Registered: June 2013
Karma: 0
|
Junior Member |
|
|
On Sunday, February 16, 2020 at 9:30:20 PM UTC-6, Daniel60 wrote:
> Faux Dameron wrote on 17/02/2020 9:04 AM:
>
> <Snip>
>
>> This group is probably dead but the #1 way to bring back usenet is to use
>> it.
>
> Not having seen Star Trek:Picard (I'm in Australia and don't have Pay
> T.V.!), I cannot answer your specific questions, but I do agree with
> your last statement.
>
> If I were to have a question about (unseen) Star Trek:Picard, it would
> be along the lines of ..... As I understand it, this series is based
> *AFTER* Picard has left Starfleet, so why is it called *Star Trek* at all??
>
> Just to get the Fan Base viewing, I guess!
>
> --
> Daniel
Picard may have left Starfleet, but Starfleet is still very much involved. Sorry for the small spoiler.
|
|
|
|
| Re: ST:Picard questions [message #406190 is a reply to message #406189] |
Thu, 20 February 2020 01:18 |
|
|
Originally posted by: Daniel60
Shannon wrote on 20/02/2020 3:22 PM:
> On Sunday, February 16, 2020 at 9:30:20 PM UTC-6, Daniel60 wrote:
>> Faux Dameron wrote on 17/02/2020 9:04 AM:
>>
>> <Snip>
>>
>>> This group is probably dead but the #1 way to bring back usenet
>>> is to use it.
>>
>> Not having seen Star Trek:Picard (I'm in Australia and don't have
>> Pay T.V.!), I cannot answer your specific questions, but I do agree
>> with your last statement.
>>
>> If I were to have a question about (unseen) Star Trek:Picard, it
>> would be along the lines of ..... As I understand it, this series
>> is based *AFTER* Picard has left Starfleet, so why is it called
>> *Star Trek* at all??
>>
>> Just to get the Fan Base viewing, I guess!
>>
>> -- Daniel
>
> Picard may have left Starfleet, but Starfleet is still very much
> involved. Sorry for the small spoiler.
>
As I typed "Not having seen Star Trek:Picard", so O.K., then!
--
Daniel
|
|
|
|
| Re: ST:Picard questions (spoilers) [message #406192 is a reply to message #406189] |
Thu, 20 February 2020 12:06 |
|
|
Originally posted by: Faux Dameron
Shannon wrote:
>
> Picard may have left Starfleet, but Starfleet is still very much involved.
> Sorry for the small spoiler.
Patrick Stewart said before the show launched that the "new starfleet" is
inspired by Brexit, but it's not really an apt comparison unless you think
aliens are secretly invading the UK.
FYI, I x-posted this thread on rec.arts.sf.startrek.current.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: ST:Picard questions [message #406194 is a reply to message #406188] |
Wed, 18 March 2020 13:22 |
Wouter Valentijn
Messages: 228
Registered: December 2012
Karma: 0
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Op 17-2-2020 om 04:30 schreef Daniel60:
> Faux Dameron wrote on 17/02/2020 9:04 AM:
>
> <Snip>
>
>> This group is probably dead but the #1 way to bring back usenet is to use
>> it.
>
> Not having seen Star Trek:Picard (I'm in Australia and don't have Pay
> T.V.!), I cannot answer your specific questions, but I do agree with
> your last statement.
>
> If I were to have a question about (unseen) Star Trek:Picard, it would
> be along the lines of ..... As I understand it, this series is based
> *AFTER* Picard has left Starfleet, so why is it called *Star Trek* at all??
>
> Just to get the Fan Base viewing, I guess!
>
Uhm... Because the name of the franchise is 'Star Trek', and not
'Starfleet'. :-)
--
Wouter Valentijn
Kirk: "No beach to walk on..."
Star Trek (s01e07): The Naked Time
http://www.prozaportal.j3v.net
http://www.essayportal.j3v.net
liam=mail
|
|
|
|
Members
Search
Help
Register
Login
Home
