|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: ProDOS 3.2.1 [message #384563 is a reply to message #384371] |
Sun, 23 June 2019 10:04   |
Antoine Vignau
Messages: 1860
Registered: October 2012
Karma: 0
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Hi Doc.,
Your ProDOS 3.0.1 and ProDOS 3.2.1 (and not 3.1.2) are based on John Brooks' ProDOS 2.4 & 2.4.1 with a modified bye program, I truly believe that your versioning brings noise to the latest releases of ProDOS 8 and your 3.2.1 does not even include the true ProDOS 2.4.2 which solves an important bug in 2.4.1.
So, here is ProDOS 3.2.5, the Super Enterprize Edition, cracked by Ze SlackerZ. It is based on ProDOS 2.4.2, it includes Bitsy Bye (I do not like that bye program but it is still here), and your utilities are also on the disk..
It is available at http://www.brutaldeluxe.fr/projects/prodos325/ProDOS%203..2. 5.dsk
Antoine
|
|
|
|
| Re: ProDOS 3.2.1 [message #384566 is a reply to message #384563] |
Sun, 23 June 2019 14:46 |
Tom Lake
Messages: 450
Registered: May 2012
Karma: 0
|
Senior Member |
|
|
On Sunday, June 23, 2019 at 10:04:58 AM UTC-4, Antoine Vignau wrote:
> Hi Doc.,
>
> Your ProDOS 3.0.1 and ProDOS 3.2.1 (and not 3.1.2) are based on John Brooks' ProDOS 2.4 & 2.4.1 with a modified bye program, I truly believe that your versioning brings noise to the latest releases of ProDOS 8 and your 3.2.1 does not even include the true ProDOS 2.4.2 which solves an important bug in 2.4.1.
>
> So, here is ProDOS 3.2.5, the Super Enterprize Edition, cracked by Ze SlackerZ. It is based on ProDOS 2.4.2, it includes Bitsy Bye (I do not like that bye program but it is still here), and your utilities are also on the disk.
>
> It is available at http://www.brutaldeluxe.fr/projects/prodos325/ProDOS%203.2.5 .dsk
>
> Antoine
What's a "FIST CRACK"?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: ProDOS 3.2.1 [message #384575 is a reply to message #384563] |
Mon, 24 June 2019 11:13 |
|
|
Originally posted by: fadden
Up next, Pro DOS 3.3, the professional version of DOS 3.3, based on DOS 4.1. It ships on the back side of a floppy with ProDOS 3.3.
It also ships with GS/OS SYSTEM 6.0.4, which is like System 6.0.4 but all the filesystems are case-sensitive. When saying it out loud you're supposed to bounce on your toes while saying "SYSTEM" to make it clear which version you mean.
(Maybe we can identify variants by appending initials to the base version instead? Or at least version the OS kernel separately from the disk contents. Maybe we can give them code names like Linux distributions... ProDOS Leaping Lizard.)
|
|
|
|
| Re: ProDOS 3.2.1 [message #384583 is a reply to message #384575] |
Tue, 25 June 2019 00:31 |
Jeff Blakeney
Messages: 125
Registered: September 2013
Karma: 0
|
Senior Member |
|
|
On 2019-06-24 11:13 a.m., fadden wrote:
> Up next, Pro DOS 3.3, the professional version of DOS 3.3, based on
> DOS 4.1. It ships on the back side of a floppy with ProDOS 3.3.
>
> It also ships with GS/OS SYSTEM 6.0.4, which is like System 6.0.4 but
> all the filesystems are case-sensitive. When saying it out loud
> you're supposed to bounce on your toes while saying "SYSTEM" to make
> it clear which version you mean.
>
> (Maybe we can identify variants by appending initials to the base
> version instead? Or at least version the OS kernel separately from
> the disk contents. Maybe we can give them code names like Linux
> distributions... ProDOS Leaping Lizard.)
Please do make sure that these versions are labelled very clearly. I
have absolutely no interest in having an operating system where the file
names are case sensitive. The only reason I can see it having been
implemented in the first place was lazy coders not wanting to convert
file names to all one case before doing comparisons for equality. Why
on earth would I want to have a file called "System" be different than a
file called "SYSTEM" or one of a whole lot of other variations. In
English, the word "System" means the same regardless of what
capitalization of letters you use.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: ProDOS 3.2.1 [message #384590 is a reply to message #384589] |
Tue, 25 June 2019 10:36 |
Jeff Blakeney
Messages: 125
Registered: September 2013
Karma: 0
|
Senior Member |
|
|
On 2019-06-25 9:29 a.m., Antoine Vignau wrote:> Andy: I like that
> Jeff: it was a joke from Andy
Sorry, I didn't catch it. It was late and I was tired and I had checked
my messages just before going to bed.
However, my opinion on case sensitive file names remains the same. :)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: ProDOS 3.2.1 [message #384594 is a reply to message #384591] |
Tue, 25 June 2019 15:28 |
|
|
Originally posted by: Brian Patrie
On 25/06/2019 12.24, Antoine Vignau wrote:
> No worries, Jeff.
>
> Ahem... my DOS 3.4 (a real thing at http://www.brutaldeluxe.fr/projects/dos34/) is case sensitive to typing but case insensitive (all uppercase) in I/O
>
> You can: bload LoGo
> it will load LOGO
> It does not store LoGo in the catalog
>
> av
As a Linux user, i'm used to case-preserving, case-sensitive; but i like
case-preserving, case-insensitive (i.e. mixed case is stored, but
matching case is not required).
|
|
|
|
| Re: ProDOS 3.2.1 [message #384691 is a reply to message #384575] |
Sat, 29 June 2019 00:08 |
mdj
Messages: 301
Registered: December 2012
Karma: 0
|
Senior Member |
|
|
On Tuesday, 25 June 2019 01:13:31 UTC+10, fadden wrote:
> (Maybe we can identify variants by appending initials to the base version instead? Or at least version the OS kernel separately from the disk contents. Maybe we can give them code names like Linux distributions... ProDOS Leaping Lizard.)
This times a million.
I might be a bit wierd, but I don't think better BYE programs that are mainly useful for choosing which of Qkumba's ports I want to play today justify incremental operating system version numbers. I like the BYE program that ProSEL installs at startup myself ...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Members
Search
Help
Register
Login
Home
