|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Was Apple IIgs BASIC vaporware? [message #383872 is a reply to message #383870] |
Sun, 12 May 2019 23:35   |
gids.rs
Messages: 1395
Registered: October 2012
Karma: 0
|
Senior Member |
|
|
On Sunday, May 12, 2019 at 5:25:34 PM UTC-6, KP wrote:
> On Sunday, May 12, 2019 at 6:16:26 PM UTC-4, Antoine Vignau wrote:
>> Hi KP,
>> More manuals than the one (I) scanned for which you provided a link: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/19Ki7Cbcw3idoQjl9bp3u 170ZjTJRFbir
>>
>> I have the disk image and an updated version with some bug fixes and new features. I'll share them.
>>
>> Antoine
>
> Antoine, thank you very much. Please let me know when you have shared the disk image and the updated version.
It has already been shared.
mirrors.apple2.org.za/ftp.apple.asimov.net/images/gs/program ming/basic/GSoft_BASIC.ZIP
|
|
|
|
| Re: Was Apple IIgs BASIC vaporware? [message #383873 is a reply to message #383872] |
Sun, 12 May 2019 23:46 |
KP
Messages: 62
Registered: December 2012
Karma: 0
|
Member |
|
|
On Sunday, May 12, 2019 at 11:35:49 PM UTC-4, I am Rob wrote:
> On Sunday, May 12, 2019 at 5:25:34 PM UTC-6, KP wrote:
>> On Sunday, May 12, 2019 at 6:16:26 PM UTC-4, Antoine Vignau wrote:
>>> Hi KP,
>>> More manuals than the one (I) scanned for which you provided a link: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/19Ki7Cbcw3idoQjl9bp3u 170ZjTJRFbir
>>>
>>> I have the disk image and an updated version with some bug fixes and new features. I'll share them.
>>>
>>> Antoine
>>
>> Antoine, thank you very much. Please let me know when you have shared the disk image and the updated version.
>
>
> It has already been shared.
>
> mirrors.apple2.org.za/ftp.apple.asimov.net/images/gs/program ming/basic/GSoft_BASIC.ZIP
I'm sorry, but I was looking for "Apple IIgs BASIC," not "GSoft BASIC." It appears that "GSoft BASIC" was developed by The Byte Works in the late 1990s. It appears that "Apple IIgs BASIC" was developed by Apple Computer in the late 1980s.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Was Apple IIgs BASIC vaporware? [message #383898 is a reply to message #383873] |
Tue, 14 May 2019 00:45 |
gids.rs
Messages: 1395
Registered: October 2012
Karma: 0
|
Senior Member |
|
|
On Sunday, May 12, 2019 at 9:46:57 PM UTC-6, KP wrote:
> On Sunday, May 12, 2019 at 11:35:49 PM UTC-4, I am Rob wrote:
>> On Sunday, May 12, 2019 at 5:25:34 PM UTC-6, KP wrote:
>>> On Sunday, May 12, 2019 at 6:16:26 PM UTC-4, Antoine Vignau wrote:
>>>> Hi KP,
>>>> More manuals than the one (I) scanned for which you provided a link: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/19Ki7Cbcw3idoQjl9bp3u 170ZjTJRFbir
>>>>
>>>> I have the disk image and an updated version with some bug fixes and new features. I'll share them.
>>>>
>>>> Antoine
>>>
>>> Antoine, thank you very much. Please let me know when you have shared the disk image and the updated version.
>>
>>
>> It has already been shared.
>>
>> mirrors.apple2.org.za/ftp.apple.asimov.net/images/gs/program ming/basic/GSoft_BASIC.ZIP
>
> I'm sorry, but I was looking for "Apple IIgs BASIC," not "GSoft BASIC." It appears that "GSoft BASIC" was developed by The Byte Works in the late 1990s. It appears that "Apple IIgs BASIC" was developed by Apple Computer in the late 1980s.
My mistake. I thought GSoft was an acronym for GS Applesoft.
|
|
|
|
| Re: Was Apple IIgs BASIC vaporware? [message #383903 is a reply to message #383898] |
Tue, 14 May 2019 12:14 |
Antoine Vignau
Messages: 1860
Registered: October 2012
Karma: 0
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Steve is right. IIgs Basic is very close to the Apple III basic with toolbox extensions.
What is not fun is that it is a 8-bit basic inside a 16-bit app. The code is very ugly to read.
I'll share my updates once I am done adding two commands. And if they run, that means the disassembled code is OK. No ETA. Not so useful apart from validating the disassembly.
Antoine
|
|
|
|
| Re: Was Apple IIgs BASIC vaporware? [message #385879 is a reply to message #383903] |
Fri, 09 August 2019 16:03 |
|
|
Originally posted by: Denis Molony
On Wednesday, 15 May 2019 02:14:03 UTC+10, Antoine Vignau wrote:
> Steve is right. IIgs Basic is very close to the Apple III basic with toolbox extensions.
>
> What is not fun is that it is a 8-bit basic inside a 16-bit app. The code is very ugly to read.
>
> I'll share my updates once I am done adding two commands. And if they run, that means the disassembled code is OK. No ETA. Not so useful apart from validating the disassembly.
>
> Antoine
Antoine, do you have any technical documentation for IIgs Basic? In particular the token list?
|
|
|
|
| Re: Was Apple IIgs BASIC vaporware? [message #385884 is a reply to message #385879] |
Fri, 09 August 2019 18:04 |
|
|
Originally posted by: Denis Molony
On Saturday, 10 August 2019 06:03:10 UTC+10, Denis Molony wrote:
> On Wednesday, 15 May 2019 02:14:03 UTC+10, Antoine Vignau wrote:
>> Steve is right. IIgs Basic is very close to the Apple III basic with toolbox extensions.
>>
>> What is not fun is that it is a 8-bit basic inside a 16-bit app. The code is very ugly to read.
>>
>> I'll share my updates once I am done adding two commands. And if they run, that means the disassembled code is OK. No ETA. Not so useful apart from validating the disassembly.
>>
>> Antoine
>
> Antoine, do you have any technical documentation for IIgs Basic? In particular the token list?
I found this - http://www.apple-iigs.info/doc/fichiers/decgsbasic.pdf
|
|
|
|
|
|
Members
Search
Help
Register
Login
Home
