Future Star Trek Movies [message #53423] |
Wed, 01 May 2013 18:31 |
arnold
Messages: 26 Registered: May 2013
Karma: 0
|
Junior Member |
|
|
Message-ID: <273@gatech.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 6-Jul-83 15:15:57 EDT
Article-I.D.: gatech.273
Posted: Wed Jul 6 15:15:57 1983
Date-Received: Fri, 8-Jul-83 04:54:39 EDT
Organization: Georgia Tech, School of ICS
Lines: 33
Star Trek I was a movie with a new script, not borrowing
any specific plot ideas from any of the TV episodes.
Star Trek II did take an idea from the TV series, with the
return of Kahn and his wrath at Kirk.
Star Trek III is reportedly being scripted and is tentatively
titled "In Search of Spock." Apparently an all new script that doesn't
borrow from the series.
I'm wandering if there is a pattern emerging in how they
write Star Trek movies... new, old, new, old, etc.
If so, after "In Search of Spock", we're due for one which
borrows from the series again?
In short, are we destined to see
Star Trek IV
********************************
* THE REVENGE OF HARRY MUDD!!! *
********************************
Donning my asbestos suit,
--
Arnold Robbins
Arnold @ GATech (CS Net)
Arnold.GATech @ UDel-Relay (ARPA)
...!{sb1, allegra}!gatech!arnold (uucp)
...!decvax!cornell!allegra!gatech!arnold
|
|
|
Re: Future Star Trek Movies [message #53430 is a reply to message #53423] |
Wed, 01 May 2013 18:31 |
wjv
Messages: 9 Registered: February 2013
Karma: 0
|
Junior Member |
|
|
Message-ID: <489@ihuxi.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 8-Jul-83 08:37:48 EDT
Article-I.D.: ihuxi.489
Posted: Fri Jul 8 08:37:48 1983
Date-Received: Fri, 8-Jul-83 19:25:08 EDT
References: gatech.273, <5514@unc.UUCP>
Organization: BTL Naperville, Il.
Lines: 9
Tim
There is a BIG difference between being similar (borrowing a idea or concept)
and being based on (such as a sequel).
William Vojak (WECo)
ihnss!ihuxi!wjv
P.S. I don't care if secondary smoke is or is not a health hazard. IT STINKS.
|
|
|
Re: Future Star Trek Movies [message #53432 is a reply to message #53423] |
Wed, 01 May 2013 18:31 |
lab
Messages: 24 Registered: February 2013
Karma: 0
|
Junior Member |
|
|
Message-ID: <369@qubix.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 8-Jul-83 10:00:29 EDT
Article-I.D.: qubix.369
Posted: Fri Jul 8 10:00:29 1983
Date-Received: Fri, 8-Jul-83 19:41:41 EDT
References: <273@gatech.UUCP>
Organization: Qubix Graphic Systems, Saratoga, CA
Lines: 7
Re: *********************************** ** THE REVENGE OF HARRY MUDD!! ** ***********************************
I'm all for it! (Getting rid of 500 Stellas, managing to
convince the androids that he's no longer an irritant...)
(I'd also like to see the Andrece sisters again!)
Larry Bickford, decvax!decwrl!qubix!lab (net.startrek regular)
|
|
|
Re: Future Star Trek Movies [message #53433 is a reply to message #53423] |
Wed, 01 May 2013 18:31 |
raf
Messages: 6 Registered: May 2013
Karma: 0
|
Junior Member |
|
|
Message-ID: <126@loux.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 7-Jul-83 11:04:37 EDT
Article-I.D.: loux.126
Posted: Thu Jul 7 11:04:37 1983
Date-Received: Sat, 9-Jul-83 12:53:31 EDT
References: <273@gatech.UUCP>
Organization: Bell Labs, Holmdel NJ
Lines: 7
I beg to differ - the first star trek movie
(read star drek)
was indeed lifted from a tv episode. I don't
remember the name of the episode, but in it
v...ger was only three feet tall and called kirk
*the creator*.
Ron Flannery
|
|
|
Re: Future Star Trek Movies [message #53435 is a reply to message #53423] |
Wed, 01 May 2013 18:31 |
tim
Messages: 230 Registered: February 2013
Karma: 0
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Message-ID: <5514@unc.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 7-Jul-83 12:08:03 EDT
Article-I.D.: unc.5514
Posted: Thu Jul 7 12:08:03 1983
Date-Received: Sat, 9-Jul-83 13:08:25 EDT
References: gatech.273
Lines: 13
Like Hell the first Star Trek movie didn't borrow from the series!
Didn't you ever see "The Changeling", where a strange space probe
wants to sterilize Earth, but it turns out that it is actually an
Earth-launched probe which has acquired sentience by colliding with an
alien ship and fusing with it? No similarity there, huh?
______________________________________
The overworked keyboard of Tim Maroney
duke!unc!tim (USENET)
tim.unc@udel-relay (ARPA)
The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
|
|
|
Re: Future Star Trek Movies [message #53461 is a reply to message #53423] |
Wed, 01 May 2013 18:31 |
zzz
Messages: 1 Registered: May 2013
Karma: 0
|
Junior Member |
|
|
Message-ID: <422@mit-eddie.UUCP>
Date: Sun, 10-Jul-83 14:59:18 EDT
Article-I.D.: mit-eddi.422
Posted: Sun Jul 10 14:59:18 1983
Date-Received: Mon, 11-Jul-83 01:27:56 EDT
References: <273@gatech.UUCP> <126@loux.UUCP>
Organization: MIT, Cambridge, MA
Lines: 5
Yeah, the name of the probe was NOMAD.
Not even a "Trekkie",
-Mike
|
|
|
Re: Future Star Trek Movies [message #53490 is a reply to message #53423] |
Wed, 01 May 2013 18:31 |
tech
Messages: 6 Registered: May 2013
Karma: 0
|
Junior Member |
|
|
Message-ID: <171@auvax.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 11-Jul-83 17:01:26 EDT
Article-I.D.: auvax.171
Posted: Mon Jul 11 17:01:26 1983
Date-Received: Tue, 12-Jul-83 19:44:55 EDT
References: gatech.273
Lines: 12
Regarding Star Trek I, admittedly the movie origional but the idea of robots
reaching new fronteirs of cooperation and creativity is similar to the plight
of Nomad - a simple robot probe with delusions of grandeur. Star Trek movies
have not yet in my view had a totally new plot.
DeForest Kelly once commented some years back (before Star Trek I) that they
couldn't make the movie because they couldn't find a big enough plot. He then
joked about somebody suggesting Jesus Christ returning to end the universe
and being told that the idea wasn't big enough.
Richard Loken
|
|
|