Megalextoria
Retro computing and gaming, sci-fi books, tv and movies and other geeky stuff.

Home » Digital Archaeology » Computer Arcana » Computer Folklore » How to satisfy the bottom-posting pedants (and thereby show that the whole argument is a storm in a teacup?)
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Switch to threaded view of this topic Create a new topic Submit Reply
How to satisfy the bottom-posting pedants (and thereby show that the whole argument is a storm in a teacup?) [message #411330] Tue, 28 September 2021 04:22 Go to next message
Anonymous
Karma:
Originally posted by: gareth evans

Take the post to which you are replying, let one word
only of the post to be quoted, then put the whole
of your otherwise-top-posted reply in there, followed
by the remainder of what you are quoting.

Everybody happy?
Re: How to satisfy the bottom-posting pedants (and thereby show that the whole argument is a storm in a teacup?) [message #411346 is a reply to message #411330] Tue, 28 September 2021 17:37 Go to previous messageGo to next message
D.J. is currently offline  D.J.
Messages: 589
Registered: January 2012
Karma: 0
Senior Member
On Tue, 28 Sep 2021 09:22:45 +0100, gareth evans
<headstone255@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Take the post to which you are replying, let one word
> only of the post to be quoted, then put the whole
> of your otherwise-top-posted reply in there, followed
> by the remainder of what you are quoting.
>
> Everybody happy?

Nope, because top posting is unacceptible.
Re: How to satisfy the bottom-posting pedants (and thereby show that the whole argument is a storm in a teacup?) [message #411368 is a reply to message #411346] Wed, 29 September 2021 11:36 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Anonymous
Karma:
Originally posted by: gareth evans

On 28/09/2021 22:37, D.J. wrote:
> N

Do you mean, "unacceptable"?

> ope, because top posting is unacceptible.
>
Re: How to satisfy the bottom-posting pedants (and thereby show that the whole argument is a storm in a teacup?) [message #411375 is a reply to message #411346] Wed, 29 September 2021 13:00 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Anonymous
Karma:
Originally posted by: maus

On 2021-09-28, D.J <chucktheouch@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Sep 2021 09:22:45 +0100, gareth evans
> <headstone255@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> Take the post to which you are replying, let one word
>> only of the post to be quoted, then put the whole
>> of your otherwise-top-posted reply in there, followed
>> by the remainder of what you are quoting.
>>
>> Everybody happy?
>
> Nope, because top posting is unacceptible.

++
--
greymausg@mail.com
Down the wrong mousehole.
Re: How to satisfy the bottom-posting pedants (and thereby show that the whole argument is a storm in a teacup?) [message #411381 is a reply to message #411368] Wed, 29 September 2021 14:29 Go to previous message
D.J. is currently offline  D.J.
Messages: 589
Registered: January 2012
Karma: 0
Senior Member
On Wed, 29 Sep 2021 16:36:35 +0100, gareth evans
<headstone255@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On 28/09/2021 22:37, D.J. wrote:
>> N
>
> Do you mean, "unacceptable"?
>
>> ope, because top posting is unacceptible.
>>

Well, no I don't.
  Switch to threaded view of this topic Create a new topic Submit Reply
Previous Topic: Re: Obit - Sir Clive Sinclair, Computing Pioneer
Next Topic: Usenet Archaeology
Goto Forum:
  

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Sun Nov 28 04:18:00 EST 2021

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00778 seconds