Retro computing and gaming, sci-fi books, tv and movies and other geeky stuff.

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Switch to threaded view of this topic Create a new topic Submit Reply
LEGAL AND MORAL DILEMMAS OF DRONE STRIKES IN A FREE SOCIETY [message #26972] Mon, 03 December 2012 10:08
CyberkNight is currently offline  CyberkNight
Messages: 1503
Registered: July 2012
Karma: 0
Senior Member
The American government is now using over 7,500 drones to strike targets in Libya, Yemen, Somalia, Pakistan and Afghanistan. Drone strikes in Pakistan alone have killed up to 3,341 people so far, despite a lack of Congressional approval. But besides being illegal on Constitutional grounds, the drone strikes set dangerous new precedents that challenge the most basic tenets of a moral society.

Regarding civilian casualties, counterterrorism czar John Brennan said in June of 2011, "Due to our discretion and precision, the U.S. government has not found credible evidence of collateral deaths resulting from U.S. counterterrorism operations outside of Afghanistan or Iraq."

But the facts speak otherwise, with hundreds of reports coming in from news sources worldwide of civilian casualties. Perhaps one of the problems with the U.S Government's analysis is that the C.I.A often labels any military age male within the vicinity of a drone strike as an insurgent.

Take for instance a drone strike in Pakistan in 2011 where at least 40 people were killed at an outdoor meeting over a tribal land dispute in broad daylight. This meeting had been approved by the Pakistani military ten days earlier, but due to faulty intelligence missiles were fired into the gathering by a predator drone. It is unclear if any of those people were affiliated with a terrorist group. But even if the intelligence had been sound and there was a Taliban or Al-Qaeda member present, questions remain. A police officer cannot go into a store shooting random people merely because one customer is a wanted criminal.

Even American citizens are not protected from being targeted and assassinated. Take the story of 16-year-old American citizen Abdulrahman al-Awlaki, the son of notorious Al-Qaeda sympathizer Anwar Al-Awlaki. The boy was killed in a drone strike in Yemen along with his teenage cousin and six others. He was born in Denver and lived with his grandparents. He hadn't been in contact with his father in over two years, but a month before his death he snuck out of his home, unsuccessfully looking for his father whom he had discovered was on an American kill list.

While en route he learned of his father's assassination and was heading home. He was actually eating dinner with his second cousin and family friends when he was killed. News reports based on government sources originally claimed he was a 21-year-old al-Qaeda fighter until his grandparents provided a birth certificate to the Washington Post. No acknowledgement has been made to the family from those responsible, although the family has filed suit against Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta and CIA director David Petraeus.

When asked about how it was possible that 16 year-old Al-Awlaki could have been targeted, Press Secretary Robert Gibbs said, "I would suggest that you should have a far more responsible father if they are truly concerned about the wellbeing of their children." This sort of talk from high level Obama officials is disgraceful and shows a lack of respect for innocent human life.

Full article: rone-strikes-in-a-free-society

  Switch to threaded view of this topic Create a new topic Submit Reply
Previous Topic: French Socialist in Mittal Row: We're Just Doing What Obama Does
Next Topic: Deepwater Horizon oil spill 'cleanup' made toxicity worse, study finds
Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Fri Jan 15 09:32:06 EST 2021

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00363 seconds