WinVice 2.4: drive write issue [message #210424] |
Tue, 05 November 2013 14:05 |
Harry Potter
Messages: 1304 Registered: March 2012
Karma: 0
|
Senior Member |
|
|
I've been using WinVice 2.4 and been running into a problem: true drive writes don't work right. When I write to a C1571 drive on x128, the error channel reads a syntax error. DIRECTORY afterwards reveals a corrupt directory. At least the disk image doesn't get corrupt. :) I think it occured on x64/c1541 as well. This forced me to use V2.2 instead. I'm pretty sure that V2.4 contains many improvements, but one bad apple spoiled the bunch. :( Can somebody e-mail the VICE team this bug for me with and offer me feedback about this problem?
|
|
|
Re: WinVice 2.4: drive write issue [message #210426 is a reply to message #210424] |
Tue, 05 November 2013 18:23 |
Clocky
Messages: 1212 Registered: December 2011
Karma: 0
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Harry Potter wrote:
> I've been using WinVice 2.4 and been running into a problem: true drive writes don't work right. When I write to a C1571 drive on x128, the error channel reads a syntax error. DIRECTORY afterwards reveals a corrupt directory. At least the disk image doesn't get corrupt. :) I think it occured on x64/c1541 as well. This forced me to use V2.2 instead. I'm pretty sure that V2.4 contains many improvements, but one bad apple spoiled the bunch. :( Can somebody e-mail the VICE team this bug for me with and offer me feedback about this problem?
>
Do it yourself.
|
|
|
Re: WinVice 2.4: drive write issue [message #210454 is a reply to message #210426] |
Sat, 16 November 2013 13:26 |
<address_is
Messages: 19 Registered: January 2013
Karma: 0
|
Junior Member |
|
|
> Harry Potter wrote:
>> I've been using WinVice 2.4 and been running into a problem: true drive
>> writes don't work right. When I write to a C1571 drive on x128, the
>> error channel reads a syntax error. DIRECTORY afterwards reveals a
>> corrupt directory. At least the disk image doesn't get corrupt. :) I
>> think it occured on x64/c1541 as well. This forced me to use V2.2
>> instead. I'm pretty sure that V2.4 contains many improvements, but one
>> bad apple spoiled the bunch. :( Can somebody e-mail the VICE team this
>> bug for me with and offer me feedback about this problem?
> Do it yourself.
What an insensitive clod you are, Clockmeister... ;-)
--
SD!
|
|
|