Megalextoria
Retro computing and gaming, sci-fi books, tv and movies and other geeky stuff.

Home » Sci-Fi/Fantasy » Babylon 5 (moderated) » RIP O'Hare.
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Switch to threaded view of this topic Create a new topic Submit Reply
RIP O'Hare. [message #17551] Sat, 29 September 2012 00:19 Go to next message
Duggy is currently offline  Duggy
Messages: 316
Registered: January 2012
Karma: 0
Senior Member
There's not much more to say.
Re: RIP O'Hare. [message #17726 is a reply to message #17551] Mon, 01 October 2012 07:25 Go to previous messageGo to next message
nance is currently offline  nance
Messages: 1
Registered: June 2012
Karma: 0
Junior Member
Duggy <P.Allan.Duggan@gmail.com> wrote:
> There's not much more to say.



Sad. RIP Michael.
Re: RIP O'Hare. [message #17781 is a reply to message #17726] Mon, 01 October 2012 18:45 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Nicole Massey is currently offline  Nicole Massey
Messages: 67
Registered: July 2012
Karma: 0
Member
"Anthony Nance" <nance@math.ohio-state.edu> wrote in message
news:k4buit$9e5$1@dont-email.me...
> Duggy <P.Allan.Duggan@gmail.com> wrote:

>> There's not much more to say.

>

>

> Sad. RIP Michael.


Agreed. He will be missed.
Re: RIP O'Hare. [message #17791 is a reply to message #17551] Mon, 01 October 2012 19:40 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Matthew Vincent is currently offline  Matthew Vincent
Messages: 8
Registered: October 2012
Karma: 0
Junior Member
On Saturday, September 29, 2012 4:19:47 PM UTC+12, Duggy wrote:
> There's not much more to say.


My deepest sympathies for his loss.

Matthew
Re: RIP O'Hare. [message #17819 is a reply to message #17791] Tue, 02 October 2012 03:20 Go to previous messageGo to next message
StarFuryG7 is currently offline  StarFuryG7
Messages: 50
Registered: July 2012
Karma: 0
Member
I did post an article link to io9 over the weekend concerning this,
but as with so many of my post attempts here, it hasn't shown up
Re: RIP O'Hare. [message #17820 is a reply to message #17819] Tue, 02 October 2012 04:14 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Duggy is currently offline  Duggy
Messages: 316
Registered: January 2012
Karma: 0
Senior Member
On Tuesday, 2 October 2012 17:20:16 UTC+10, StarFuryG7 wrote:
> I did post an article link to io9 over the weekend concerning this,

>

> but as with so many of my post attempts here, it hasn't shown up


Add it to this thread if it doesn't turn up...
Re: RIP O'Hare. [message #17914 is a reply to message #17551] Tue, 02 October 2012 20:10 Go to previous messageGo to next message
news is currently offline  news
Messages: 157
Registered: October 2012
Karma: 0
Senior Member
Agreed, not much more to say. My condolences to his family and friends.

A question for the group:
In July of last year JMS posted a Facebook request on the whereabouts and condition of O'Hare.
Was the cause of death in any way related to O'Hare's condition/situation last year?

Mike

On 9/29/2012 12:19 AM, Duggy wrote:
> There's not much more to say.

>
Re: RIP O'Hare. [message #17943 is a reply to message #17914] Tue, 02 October 2012 23:26 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Duggy is currently offline  Duggy
Messages: 316
Registered: January 2012
Karma: 0
Senior Member
On Wednesday, 3 October 2012 10:11:41 UTC+10, news wrote:
> A question for the group:


> In July of last year JMS posted a Facebook request on the whereabouts and condition of O'Hare.


> Was the cause of death in any way related to O'Hare's condition/situation last year?


He was retiring from public life then. He died of a heart attack.

It's possible that he retired from public life for health reasons, I guess.
Re: RIP O'Hare. [message #17961 is a reply to message #17820] Wed, 03 October 2012 02:41 Go to previous messageGo to next message
StarFuryG7 is currently offline  StarFuryG7
Messages: 50
Registered: July 2012
Karma: 0
Member
This sucks --I grew to like O'Hare as Sinclair in "Babylon 5" by the
end of the first season. Those of us that pay attention have known for
a while that something was very wrong and that he wasn't doing well.

Condolences to friends, family, and fans of Mr. O'Hare.

Over at io9:

"Goodbye to Michael O’Hare, Babylon 5’s Commander Sinclair"

http://io9.com/5947574/goodbye-to-michael-ohare-babylon-5s-c ommander-s
inclair
Re: RIP O'Hare. [message #17999 is a reply to message #17551] Wed, 03 October 2012 13:13 Go to previous messageGo to next message
wrrlykam is currently offline  wrrlykam
Messages: 6
Registered: August 2012
Karma: 0
Junior Member
On Saturday, September 29, 2012 5:19:47 AM UTC+1, Duggy wrote:
> There's not much more to say.


Aye to that. It's so sad to have lost so many so soon. May Michael rest well beyond the rim.
Re: RIP O'Hare. [message #18155 is a reply to message #17961] Fri, 05 October 2012 03:52 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Donald Arseneau is currently offline  Donald Arseneau
Messages: 2
Registered: October 2012
Karma: 0
Junior Member
StarFuryG7 <StarFuryG7@aim.com> writes:

> This sucks --I grew to like O'Hare as Sinclair in "Babylon 5" by the

> end of the first season. Those of us that pay attention have known for

> a while that something was very wrong and that he wasn't doing well.


Sad news indeed, and a surprise to someone who doesn't pay attention.

Donald Arseneau asnd@triumf.ca
Re: RIP O'Hare. [message #19210 is a reply to message #17819] Tue, 09 October 2012 17:47 Go to previous messageGo to next message
PhantomSteve is currently offline  PhantomSteve
Messages: 7
Registered: July 2012
Karma: 0
Junior Member
StarFuryG7 entertained (or was it annoyed?) us in message:

> I did post an article link to io9 over the weekend concerning this,

> but as with so many of my post attempts here, it hasn't shown up

>

>

>


FWIW I see the post from you with the following headers:

:: Path: not-for-mail
:: From: StarFuryG7@aim.com
:: Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv.babylon5.moderated
:: Subject: Goodbye to Michael O’Hare, Babylon 5’s Commander Sinclair
:: Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2012 01:04:34 -0700 (PDT)
:: Organization: Deep Thought
:: Lines: 10
:: Sender: b5mod@deepthot.org
:: Approved: b5mod@deepthot.org
:: Message-ID: <7ea32d81-a886-40b4-87c5-5c16994d1e26@googlegroups.com>
:: NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost
:: Mime-Version: 1.0
:: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
:: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
:: X-Trace: dent.deepthot 1349532085 4093 127.0.0.1 (6 Oct 2012 14:01:25
GMT)
:: X-Complaints-To: news@deepthot.org
:: NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2012 14:01:25 +0000 (UTC)
:: Injection-Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2012 08:04:35 +0000
:: User-Agent: G2/1.0
:: Delivery-Date: Sat, 06 Oct 2012 07:01:22 -0700

The "Date" and "Injection-Date" show 30th Sep, although the other date
fields all show a week later...

--
__ _ __
o|\('')/|o |_)|_ _ __ _|_ _ __ _ _|_ _ _ o|\('')/|o
\_ _/ | | |(_|| | |_(_)|||_> |_(/_\_/(/_ \_ _/
/___/ (PhantomSteve - Design : Marion Koslowski) \___\
Re: RIP O'Hare. [message #19211 is a reply to message #17781] Tue, 09 October 2012 17:55 Go to previous messageGo to next message
PhantomSteve is currently offline  PhantomSteve
Messages: 7
Registered: July 2012
Karma: 0
Junior Member
Nicole Massey entertained (or was it annoyed?) us in message:

>

> "Anthony Nance" <nance@math.ohio-state.edu> wrote in message

> news:k4buit$9e5$1@dont-email.me...

>> Duggy <P.Allan.Duggan@gmail.com> wrote:

>>> There's not much more to say.

>>

>>

>> Sad. RIP Michael.

>

> Agreed. He will be missed.

>

>

>


I think this sums it up in his own words...

Cmdr. Jeffrey Sinclair: "Nothing's the same anymore. "
"Babylon 5: Chrysalis (#1.22)" (1994)



--
__ _ __
o|\('')/|o |_)|_ _ __ _|_ _ __ _ _|_ _ _ o|\('')/|o
\_ _/ | | |(_|| | |_(_)|||_> |_(/_\_/(/_ \_ _/
/___/ (PhantomSteve - Design : Marion Koslowski) \___\
Re: RIP O'Hare. [message #19426 is a reply to message #19211] Thu, 11 October 2012 17:10 Go to previous messageGo to next message
wrrlykam is currently offline  wrrlykam
Messages: 6
Registered: August 2012
Karma: 0
Junior Member
Has notice been posted to the group that Turhan Bey had died aged 90 on 30 Sept?
Re: RIP O'Hare. [message #19449 is a reply to message #19210] Thu, 11 October 2012 22:23 Go to previous messageGo to next message
StarFuryG7 is currently offline  StarFuryG7
Messages: 50
Registered: July 2012
Karma: 0
Member
On Oct 9, 5:48 pm, PhantomSteve <phantomst...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> StarFuryG7 entertained (or was it annoyed?) us in message:

>

>> I did post an article link to io9 over the weekend concerning this,

>> but as with so many of my post attempts here, it hasn't shown up



So my remarking about posts routinely not showing up here is a source
of "entertainment" or "annoyance" rather than curiosity or simple
interest?

Gee, why am I not surprised? That sure does explain a lot.


> FWIW I see the post from you with the following headers:

>

> :: Path: not-for-mail

> :: From: StarFur...@aim.com

> :: Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv.babylon5.moderated

> :: Subject: Goodbye to Michael O Hare, Babylon 5 s Commander  Sinclair

> :: Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2012 01:04:34 -0700 (PDT)

> :: Organization: Deep Thought

> :: Lines: 10

> :: Sender: b5...@deepthot.org

> :: Approved: b5...@deepthot.org

> :: Message-ID: <7ea32d81-a886-40b4-87c5-5c16994d1e26@googlegroups.com>

> :: NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost

> :: Mime-Version: 1.0

> :: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252

> :: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

> :: X-Trace: dent.deepthot 1349532085 4093 127.0.0.1 (6 Oct 2012 14:01:25

> GMT)

> :: X-Complaints-To: n...@deepthot.org

> :: NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2012 14:01:25 +0000 (UTC)

> :: Injection-Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2012 08:04:35 +0000

> :: User-Agent: G2/1.0

> :: Delivery-Date: Sat, 06 Oct 2012 07:01:22 -0700

>

> The "Date" and "Injection-Date" show 30th Sep, although the other date

> fields all show a week later...

>



I see, so it took my post A WEEK to finally appear here, and not only
do you not think that at all odd apparently, but you find my remarking
about it funny or bothersome. I'm glad we've cleared that up. No
wonder this newsgroup has had such a marked tendency for rubbing me
the wrong way through the years.
Re: RIP O'Hare. [message #19450 is a reply to message #19426] Thu, 11 October 2012 22:24 Go to previous messageGo to next message
StarFuryG7 is currently offline  StarFuryG7
Messages: 50
Registered: July 2012
Karma: 0
Member
On Oct 11, 5:10 pm, wrrlykam <wrrly...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Has notice been posted to the group that Turhan Bey had died aged 90 on 30 Sept?


If so, perhaps it will show up in a week, if ever ...
Re: RIP O'Hare. [message #19926 is a reply to message #19449] Tue, 16 October 2012 04:51 Go to previous messageGo to next message
PhantomSteve is currently offline  PhantomSteve
Messages: 7
Registered: July 2012
Karma: 0
Junior Member
StarFuryG7 entertained (or was it annoyed?) us in message:

> On Oct 9, 5:48 pm, PhantomSteve <phantomst...@hotmail.com> wrote:

>> StarFuryG7 entertained (or was it annoyed?) us in message:

>>

>>> I did post an article link to io9 over the weekend concerning this,

>>> but as with so many of my post attempts here, it hasn't shown up

>

>

> So my remarking about posts routinely not showing up here is a source

> of "entertainment" or "annoyance" rather than curiosity or simple

> interest?

>


Ignoring other issues, if you bothered to look at my other posts, you'll
see the "entertained (or was it annoyed?)" is used in *all* my posts in
*all* newsnet groups... it is possible to be *too* paranoid, you know...


--
__ _ __
o|\('')/|o |_)|_ _ __ _|_ _ __ _ _|_ _ _ o|\('')/|o
\_ _/ | | |(_|| | |_(_)|||_> |_(/_\_/(/_ \_ _/
/___/ (PhantomSteve - Design : Marion Koslowski) \___\
Re: RIP O'Hare. [message #19939 is a reply to message #19926] Tue, 16 October 2012 09:47 Go to previous messageGo to next message
denebeim is currently offline  denebeim
Messages: 23
Registered: September 2012
Karma: 0
Junior Member
In article <XnsA0EE644244B75phantomstevehotmailc@81.171.92.222>,
PhantomSteve <phantomsteve@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Ignoring other issues, if you bothered to look at my other posts, you'll

> see the "entertained (or was it annoyed?)" is used in *all* my posts in

> *all* newsnet groups... it is possible to be *too* paranoid, you know...


I think that's a lifestyle choice with him. I looked back through the
logs here and this has pretty much been the only topic he's ever
talked about.

Jay
--
* Jay Denebeim Moderator rec.arts.sf.tv.babylon5.moderated *
* newsgroup submission address: b5mod@deepthot.org *
* moderator contact address: b5mod-request@deepthot.org *
* personal contact address: denebeim@deepthot.org *
Re: RIP O'Hare. [message #20079 is a reply to message #19926] Wed, 17 October 2012 16:26 Go to previous messageGo to next message
StarFuryG7 is currently offline  StarFuryG7
Messages: 50
Registered: July 2012
Karma: 0
Member
On Oct 16, 4:51 am, PhantomSteve <phantomst...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>

> Ignoring other issues, if you bothered to look at my other posts, you'll

> see the "entertained (or was it annoyed?)" is used in *all* my posts in

> *all* newsnet groups... it is possible to be *too* paranoid, you know...


And you don't view that manner of quoting someone to be at all
provocative and potentially hostile? Additionally, why should I, or
anyone for that matter, be required to view your posts elsewhere to
see how you go about quoting people?

So call it "paranoid" if you want to, but you're the one who decided
to set your style of replying to someone that way, not me.
Re: RIP O'Hare. [message #20080 is a reply to message #19939] Wed, 17 October 2012 16:29 Go to previous messageGo to next message
StarFuryG7 is currently offline  StarFuryG7
Messages: 50
Registered: July 2012
Karma: 0
Member
On Oct 16, 9:48 am, deneb...@deepthot.org (Jay Denebeim) wrote:
>

> I think that's a lifestyle choice with him.  I looked back through the

> logs here and this has pretty much been the only topic he's ever

> talked about.

>

> Jay


Sure it has, though not by a long shot in actuality. Of course, you're
probably the bum who's made it a point of ditching my posts here
through the years, so why should I expect any different.
Re: RIP O'Hare. [message #48253 is a reply to message #17551] Wed, 10 April 2013 20:27 Go to previous message
JWK4EVER is currently offline  JWK4EVER
Messages: 14
Registered: April 2013
Karma: 0
Junior Member
Op zaterdag 29 september 2012 06:19:47 UTC+2 schreef Duggy het volgende:
> There's not much more to say.


I recently have (re)joined this newsgroup after years of absence and just have learned of his passing away.

Forever out of touch but never out of heart and mind
  Switch to threaded view of this topic Create a new topic Submit Reply
Previous Topic: Tonight was the Night in the Garden.
Next Topic: Relevant FARK
Goto Forum:
  

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Sat Sep 21 00:39:18 EDT 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.07570 seconds